Wednesday, October 20, 2010

join Kevin Cahill Tues. in Rhinebeck-- Building a Greener New York!...

Hi all...


Just confirmed from Assemblymember Kevin Cahill's office-- he'll definitely be holding a "Building a Greener New York" forum (I suggested this to him recently)-- at Rhinebeck Town Hall next Tues. (Oct. 26th) at 7 pm-- with special expert panel speakers Jeff Irish, Ron Kamen, and Joseph Malcarne!...


[Rhinebeck Town Hall is at 80 E. Market Street in town-- just about one block east of main light in town; see http://www.HVCE.com http://www.EarthKindSolar.com http://www.Malcarne.com for more on these]


Cahill's Green Jobs Green Homes bill info: http://www.state.ny.us/governor/press/press_1013091.html !


Don't miss this-- each one reach one-- please forward this along to all you know, folks...


[pass it on!]


Joel
444-0599/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

p.s. join 18 @ http://www.petitiononline.com/pacehere ; 37 @ http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SOLAR !...


p.p.s. Town of Clinton folks-- let us know if you want to help Gerda Cooke and Ed Tedeschi re: PACE here; thx tons to Gerda for her presentation to our Town Board here on this-- but we can't do it alone!...


p.p.p.s. Finally-- Vicky Perry's right on money here below in recent letter for Kevin: net-metering passed:
http://www.dailyfreeman.com/articles/2010/03/22/news/doc4ba6c693f1dc3605021784.txt ;
http://www.state.ny.us/governor/press/press_02231001.html ;
http://assembly.state.ny.us/member_files/101/20100321/ ;
http://assembly.state.ny.us/mem/Kevin-A-Cahill/story/29392/ !...


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/print/article/20101019/OPINION02/10190307/Letters-to-the-editor-for-10-19-10


October 19, 2010

Letters to the editor for 10/19/10
While others fume, Cahill gets results

It's just common sense to support Assemblyman Kevin Cahill this fall. Thanks to Cahill, New Yorkers finally have something that is crucial to success in getting green technology in wide use: Net-metering. Now, small businesses can sell their excess solar power back to the utilities - a real incentive to get more solar panels into use.

What is most impressive, Cahill got this bill passed while the rest of Albany was in a stalemate.
I wonder about those other candidates, who play their "angry-man" role for the cameras but won't show up to debate the issues. How can they serve us when they can't control their tempers?

Let's bring proven success back - support Kevin Cahill. He's rated 10 out of 10 in 2010.

Vicky Perry
Red Hook


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[recall below info sent out 10/10/10 in solidarity with 7000 events held all over; see http://www.350.org ]


You may be familiar with FHFA's drive to kill great PACE programs all over the U.S....


[sign http://www.petitiononline.com/pacehere -- Gillibrand, Hinchey, and Hall standing up for PACE!]


Well-- check out this good news from the Town of Bedford's NWEAC Retrofit Program Director, Tom Bregman!...(see http://www.NWEAC.org ):


From: Thomas Bregman


Date: Oct 9, 2010 4:15 PM


Our program (now that FHFA has killed a superior PACE offering for the time being) will launch using the new NYSERDA consumer credit product which allows for loans of up to $13k at 5.99%. They will be releasing the new offering in the next few weeks. We are still looking at alternatives to PACE and our finance committee (Town Boardmember David Gabrielson included) is working on what they might be. We will be going forward with a small test (5 homes) followed by a larger test (20) homes before the end of the year. Then we will launch the full Bedford Pilot in early 2011. Our goal is a total of 150 homes in year one after which we will start rolling the program out to the other NWEAC towns one-by-one.


Recall...


According to David Dell of Sustainable Hudson Valley, Dutchess County homeowners could save literally one billion dollars over the next decade on electric bills (while creating thousands of jobs) with a PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) program that gets energy-efficiency and renewable energy into all the properties that need them (see http://www.PACEnow.org , http://www.LIGreenHomes.com , http://www.PetitionOnline.com.SOLAR , http://www.SustainHV.org ).


Thanks tons to all who came out Sept. 22nd to our Clinton Town Hall forum-- "Green Energy Solutions: A PACE Program for Clinton" forum-- with Norene Coller (former long-time county EMC/town CAC chair), Jo Renbeck, Doug Smyth, Scott Brewster, Larry Freedman, Ricky and Robin Venters, Stanley and Gerda Cooke, Bernie and Donald Seifert, Judy Malstrom there (many others from all over).


[see http://www.PACEnow.org -- a local PACE program could turn around our county's economy, folks]


Thx to the following presenters as well who shared with us tons of info on all this (videotaped 'em!):


-- Clinton resident Stuart Findlay (long-time scientist with Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies)


-- Clinton resident Ron Kamen (EarthKindSolar founder, Pres. NY Solar Energy Industries Association)


-- Clinton resident Joseph Malcarne (green builder extraordinaire)


-- David Gabrielson (Bedford Town Boardmember and well-respected expert re: PACE across NYS)


-- David Dell (Sustainable Hudson Valley Chair and Independent Dutchess Energy Alliance cofounder)


-- David Byrne, Project Manager for Hudson Valley Clean Energy


Note-- brand-new online effort-- http://www.petitiononline.com/pacehere -- for folks who agree with Kirsten Gillibrand, Maurice Hinchey, John Hall, and our county's Dem Co. Leg. caucus that the Federal Home Finance Agency should once again allow PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) programs (like Babylon's-- see http://www.LIGreenHomes.com )-- to survive here in NY, across U.S.


[Doug Smyth, Scott Brewster, Johanne Renbeck, Stanley/Gerda Cooke, L. Freedman signed hard copy]


[...and I personally gave this petition to Scott Murphy when he saw him Sat. in LaGrange; call his offices (and Schumer's too): (866) 338-1015 to get them both on board H.R.5766/S.3642...]


Don't forget these important reasons why we here in Clinton (and Dutchess) can't wait for PACE here!...


Fact: PACE (Property Assessed Clean Energy) programs for our communities here-- as in Babylon, Boulder, Berkeley, Binghamton, et. al. ( http://www.PACEnow.org ).


Fact: Bedford and thirteen other towns in Westchester have formed a PACE Northern Westchester Energy Action Coalition ( http://www.NWEAC.org ).


Fact: Even Wall Street will help fund communities like Bedford and others working together to start PACE programs; NYSERDA and federal monies available as well ( http://www.LIGreenHomes.com ).


[Bedford Town Boardmember David Gabrielson and Clinton's own Ron Kamen are experts on this!]


Fact: "Sonoma County has loaned out $30 million for energy improvements to more than 1,000 homes and businesses since the program began a year and a half ago"-- creating 347 jobs so far(!).
[July 28th NPR piece-- "Outlook Dims for Popular Energy-Efficiency Loans" by John McChesney
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=128700648 Sonoma Co.-- population 472,000]


Fact: The Town of Babylon's Long Island Green Homes program by the end of August will have completed energy-efficiency retrofits in 120 homes (with 96 more waiting in queue); also solar lending.
According to the Town of Babylon's Sustainability Officer and Energy Program Director Dorian Dale,
"participating contractors have increased their employee rolls by 26% since the program began"-- and the Long Island Green Homes program is projected to create literally 6600 new green-collar jobs for the Town of Babylon-- with the average homeowner reducing their energy costs by $1160 a year(!).
[ http://www.townofbabylon.com/whatsnew.cfm?id=252 http://www.LIGreenHomes.com ; pop. 211,000]


Fact: Overwhelming majorities in our own County Legislature over the past few years (with strong GOP support no less) passed two resolutions from yours truly for an Independent Dutchess Energy Alliance.
[based on http://www.CambridgeEnergyAlliance.org -- very similar to PACE program]


Two more facts that prove exactly how effective PACE programs can be creating green jobs locally:


[PACE = Property Assessed Clean Energy = Sustainable Energy Loan fund proposal]


Fact: According to Town Boardmember David Gabrielson, the Town of Bedford is planning to make available $50 million over the next five years to loan 5000 homeowners enough funding for energy-efficiency and solar retrofits. [Bedford: population 18,000]
[see http://www.NWEAC.org ; Gabrielson made this statement on my WVKR 91.3 FM show recently]


Fact: "The Berkeley FIRST program has enabled 13 homeowners to install solar power systems, using money from bonds issued by the City." [Berkeley-- population 100,000]
[from "Solar Financing Program Invented in Berkeley, Now National, Is in Trouble" (July 19, 2010)
http://www.berkeleydailyplanet.com/issue/2010-07-13/article/35831?headline=Solar-Financing-Program-Invented-in-Berkeley-Now-National-is-In-Trouble

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Again-- if you live in NYS-- join these 18 folks signed on to http://www.petitiononline.com/pacehere !...


18.Sandra Kurtz PACE makes sense po box 385 10990
17.Mark Kurtz this must be fixed po box 385
16. Pam Krimsky A necessary bill 12528
15. Stewart Verrilli This is a "no brainer" 387 Hollow Rd. 12580
14. BarbaraThis idea makes sense. Guilford R. New Paltz, NY 12561
13. Steven Siegel Let's get this done. 25 Willow Glen Road, Red Hook, NY 12571
12. Jill Lunquist Barrytown, NY 12507
11. Jan Harrison It is important to be responsible for the health of the planet.34 Hunter St., Kingston, NY 12401
10. George Quasha green business is good business ,124 Station Hill, Barrytown, NY 12507
9. Janice Viola Super! Great Green initiatve!19 Monell Avenue, poughkeepsie, NY 12603
8. Kate and Joel Kopp we urge you to support the Sustainable Energy Financing Programs 12572
7. Duncan Christy Let's keep up the PACE! 10 Carolina Drive, Rhinebeck, NY 12572
6. Karl F. Sipperley It's a shame that this is even debated. Wake up and GET GREEN NOW! Rhinebeck, NY 12572
5. Carole Tang win, win, win PO Box 267, Poughquag, NY 12570-0267
4. Cary Kittner what's not to like about this, local green jobs. 12507
3. Barbara Upton Sounds good! 12446
2. Sylvia Bullett green P.O. Box 9/Garrison,NY 10524
1. Nora Edwards Green energy is something we really need. Wingdale, NY,, 12594

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Thanks to the thirty-seven Dutchess County residents below who have already signed on to our http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SOLAR effort too-- for Dutchess to follow the innovative PACE example of the City of Berkeley and allow homeowners here in our area the opportunity to be part of a voluntary sustainable energy financing district to install solar panels on their roofs-- the cost to be repaid over twenty years through an annual special tax on county property tax bills:

37. William Griffith every good idea helps 12583
36. Nora Edwards We need to start now to move to renewable energy. 12594
35. linda Puiatti solar: clean, cheap and available. 12531
34. Raymond Savoie very interested;home energy auditor 127 Noxon Rd Poughkeepsie,NY 12603
33. Dan Maciejak We also need the utility to buy back excess energy generated via solar / wind, the utility to be subsidized by the Federal Government. The next step! 12572
32. Nicholas O'Connor This is a necessary step in a necessary direction, and each step we take, as individual households, will add up to great progress. 1 Knights Way, Rhinebeck NY, 12572
31. Maria Katzenbach Making progress viable and affordable for all. 37 Williams Road, Red Hook, NY 12571
30. Zachary Frenzel 81 Bowman Rd, 12567
29. Emily Landri It's about time! 12540
28. Thomas Baldino I think this is a great way to cut costs, and help the environment. It is a win win situation all around. 19 North St., Beacon NY 12508
27. Chris 'Creek' Iersen What a great leap in the right direction of getting our energy sustainably. I volunteer my house to be the 'guinea pig'! 221 stonykill rd; wappingers falls, NY 12590
26. Sheryl Griffith And also NY needs to liberalize its eligibility requirements for state incentives and grid connectivity. In some state, for example, if your configuration is 70\% efficient, you get 70\% of the offered state reimbursement. But in NY if your system (due to shading or house orientation) is not at least 85\% efficient, you get nothing. 227 Linden Ave, Red Hook, NY 12571
25. Rob This is obvious 22 IBM Road, 12603
24. Christian W. Meyer Provide a stimulus and smart people will use it. We need to promote alternative energy sources. 35 Oak Grove Road Salt Point, N.Y. 12578
23. Leonard Marcus I am VERY interested in going solar 10 Lorene Dr., LaGrangeville, NY 12540
22. Dana J. Tompkins The more this is done throughout the Country, the lower the cost would become, the more people could afford it, and the snowball will start to grow. Also solar panels can be put on the ground, so you don't have to have a south facing roof. 73 College Lane Millbrook, NY 12545
21. Laura H. Liebeck-Smith Please do this 23 Heather Dr Wappingers Falls, NY 12590
20. Cynthia Cowden let's go solar now 178 Main St #1, Beacon, NY 12508
19. Matthew Verrilli I support the proposal. 12572
18. Richard R Carlson What a great idea 3 Bowdoin Lane,Wappingers Falls NY 12590
17. Eliot Goodwin Please make solar a realiy in Dutchess County 12 Petra Lane, Albany, NY 12205
16. Annie Scibienski Yes to SOLAR 12572
15. Babette Brown Please make solar panels more afforable to Dutchess County residents 12508
14. Buffy L Herman we must do this to ensure a tomorrow for everyone! 12508
13. William W. Irwin Thank You 494 South Ave, Beacon, NY 12508
12. Colleen Hardiman Please enact this solar policy 35 Larch Court, Fishkill, NY 12524
11. Mark Neustadt I agree! 8 South Hinterlands Dr., Rhinebeck 12572
10. Douglas C. Smyth Any means to promote solar power is good for people and good for the earth. 12580
9. Patricia G. Lamanna If my home is eligible (it may not have enough south-facing rooftop space) I would participate. 27 Meyer Avenue, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603
8. Nicholas Sialmas Let's Make It Happen 12508
7. Jim Schumm More solar incentives would be good for Dutchess 12508
6. Cecilia Stancell Good idea 426 Bog Hollow Rd, Wassaic, NY; 12592
5. Randi Sackheim going in the right direction 12572
4. Angela Valles Good for Dutchess County! 404 Vassar Place, Fishkill, NY 12524
3. Connie Hogarth This is an extraordiinary positive direction to make a significant leap in our role to affect both the economy and global warming. 20 Hartsook Lane, Beacon NY 12508
2. Melanie Whaley good work 12545
1. Alicia Lenhart This is a great idea and I fully support it. 12572


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[Cahill's Green Jobs Green Homes bill info: http://www.state.ny.us/governor/press/press_1013091.html ]


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
October 13, 2009
GOVERNOR PATERSON SIGNS THE GREEN JOBS/GREEN NEW YORK BILL

Program Will Assist Low-Income and Unemployed New Yorkers Train for Green Collar Jobs

Governor Paterson Launches New Website - GreenCareersNY.com - to Match Job Seekers with Green Training Opportunities

Governor David A. Paterson today signed the Green Jobs/Green New York Act, establishing a program that will create green jobs and stimulate investment in weatherization and energy efficiency improvements for residential and commercial buildings. Governor Paterson held the signing ceremony at the New York State Weatherization Directors Association training center in North Syracuse, where New Yorkers are being trained to weatherize and retrofit homes.

Assemblyman Kevin Cahill, Chair of the Assembly Energy Committee, said: "The goal of the Green Jobs/Green New York Program is three fold. It is designed to create jobs, lower energy costs for households, not-for-profits and small businesses and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This is exactly the type of innovative initiative President Obama envisions when he talks about creating green jobs and the new clean energy economy. A successful program here in New York will establish us as a national leader in tackling the tough challenges of climate change and employment opportunities in the 21st Century. I am proud to have worked with Speaker Silver and Assemblyman Sweeney to sponsor this important legislation. I thank Governor Paterson and Senator Aubertine for their leadership in guiding this package through the Senate and into law."


"The workforce training that this bill supports will prepare New Yorkers to find jobs in the 21st century clean energy economy that we are building here in New York. I am proud to sign into law the Green Jobs/Green New York Act, so we can help New Yorkers secure jobs that help working families and businesses cut their energy bills while reducing greenhouse gas pollution," said Governor Paterson. "I have laid out a New Economy jobs plan that will help to put New Yorkers back to work through innovation and technology, and have set a goal to meet 45 percent of our electricity needs through energy efficiency and renewables by 2015. The Green Jobs/Green New York Act is an important tool in achieving these energy and economic goals."

Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver said: "Thanks to the Green Jobs/Green New York legislation, homeowners, small business owners, and not-for-profit agencies are encouraged to undertake the energy efficiency projects that will reduce utility bills as well as greenhouse gas emissions. As homes and facilities are retrofitted, and green jobs are created, this program will become a much-need boost for struggling local economies throughout New York State."

Senator Darrel J. Aubertine, Chair of the Senate Energy and Telecommunications Committee, said: "I want to thank the Governor for signing this important legislation here today. This truly is a win-win for New York State which will enable homeowners and small businesses to save money on their energy bills all while creating jobs and putting thousands of New Yorkers back to work. This legislation directs these loans to be spread across the state based on need and here in Upstate New York, where keeping the heat in is a top priority each winter, this program will create jobs and save consumers on their monthly energy bills."

Governor Paterson also announced that $7 million from the State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance (OTDA) has been awarded to 11 counties and New York City to launch the new Green Jobs Corps programs. This funding will allow local departments of social services to provide job skills training and subsidized employment opportunities in "green industries" for public assistance recipients and low-income individuals. Participants in the Green Jobs Corps program will develop occupational skills that will enable them to get jobs in addition to supporting their ability to remain employed and advance in their careers.

To help connect job seekers with the opportunities being announced today, Governor Paterson also announced the launch of a new web site to assist those seeking to enter the new green job sector. The site - www.greencareersny.com - is designed to make it easy for individuals, businesses and workforce professionals to find the State's local training programs and green job opportunities.

The Green Jobs/Green New York Act (A.8901/S.5888 and chapter amendment A.9031/S.6032) directs the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) to establish revolving loan and green jobs training programs to retrofit homes to conserve energy. Loans will be capped at $13,000 for residential and $26,000 for commercial properties. The program will target middleclass homeowners and small businesses that will pay back the loan out of what they save on their energy bills. The job training component will focus on new entrants to the workforce and displaced workers. The training programs and any education and enrollment efforts will be subjected to a competitive procurement process available to community based-organizations.

To fund the weatherization loan program and establish the statewide green jobs training program, NYSERDA will use a portion of $112 million from the auction of carbon emission credits through the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI). The seed money from the RGGI fund will be used to leverage private investment, which will move us toward a goal of retrofitting one million homes over the next five years.

The Green Jobs bill will allow the State to increase its existing and successful weatherization efforts that are already underway. The Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) will eventually administer $394 million in funds under American Recover and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). By the end of this month, $190 million in 64 contracts, representing every county in New York, will be executed as part of the WAP program. Under WAP, a minimum of 45,000 residential units will be weatherized in New York State.

Senator David Valesky said: "The Green Jobs/Green NY program will help Upstate tremendously by reducing energy costs for homeowners and creating thousands of permanent, well-paying jobs. This is the kind of creative thinking we need - combining job creation with environmentally friendly initiatives - that will help jump start the Upstate New York economy. I am pleased the Governor recognized the importance of this program by signing it into law."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[see http://www.CambridgeEnergyAlliance.org for great example for Dutchess County from Cambridge, MA; two resolutions from yours truly passed with wide bipartisan margins in our County Legislature in 2008 and 2009 to create the Independent Dutchess Energy Alliance]


It's more timely than ever for us to push for PACE-like program locally-- Wall Street bond types are much more interested in helping towns start PACE-like programs like http://www.LIGreenHomes.com (Babylon) if towns like Clinton and Rhinebeck first get motivated, then band together in aggregation with other small towns-- as 13 towns have banded together in Westchester w/Town of Bedford (foundation money could become more available too as elsewhere in the country-- along with $44 million already earmarked for NYS from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative).

Recall this, too, from National Association of Counties News (each Co. Leg. receives in our mailbox):

"Energy-Efficiency Loan Program Set 'PACE' for Counties" by Charles Taylor [June 21, 2010]
[http://lists.naco.org/CountyNewsTemplate.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=33973]

[this article from NACO News points out that there are many different ways to fund PACE projects!...see: http://www.SonomaCountyEnergy.org ; http://www.RenewSantaFe.org ; http://www.BeClimateSmart.com ]

Recall, too-- it's not just towns, cities, and villages here in NYS and across the country that are getting off the dime to kick off their own PACE programs-- but counties too.

Don't forget-- the Albany County Legislature unanimously passed a resolution this February to start a PACE-like program there (a Sustainable Energy Loan Fund, the Tompkins County Legislature unanimously passed a resolution this April to start a PACE-like program there (a Sustainable Energy Loan Fund), the GOP-led Nassau County Legislature passed a resolution this March to start a PACE-like Green Energy Loan Fund there, and most of the Sullivan County Legislature is also committed to helping Dick Riseling start a PACE-like SWEEP program there as well.

[note, too-- Elizabeth Staubach in the Albany County Executive's office has confirmed with me that Albany County is indeed working towards direction of starting to implement county-wide PACE program as in Babylon]

[see: http://www.nassaucountyny.gov/agencies/legis/LD/12/03-23-10PJS01.html ;
http://www.albanycounty.com/legislature/resolutions/2010/20100208/10-046.pdf ;
http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=899947&category=region ;
http://www.sc-democrat.com/news/0006June/18/news.htm ;
http://www.tompco.net/legislature/highlights/20100420.pdf ;
http://www.tompkins-co.org/legislature/TCCOG/Resolutions/PACE.pdf ;
http://www.newsday.com/long-island/nassau/what-are-mangano-s-plans-for-nassau-1.1631313 ;
http://dutchessdemocracy.blogspot.com/2010/03/albany-co-leg-unanimous-for-green-loan.html ;
http://dutchessdemocracy.blogspot.com/2010/03/join-lucy-johnson-of-independent.html ]

And here in Dutchess, Co. Leg.'s Dan Kuffner, Barbara Jeter-Jackson, Alison MacAvery, and Jim Doxsey have all agreed to co-sponsor the resolution below (scroll down) drafted by yours truly for our County Legislature to do the same here...(and have for months).

But not ONE GOP member of our County Legislature has made commitment to co-sponsor this with us.

So-- send a letter today to all 25 of us on this-- at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!

Also true-- at the August full board meeting of the Dutchess County Legislature, I got the entire Co. Leg. Dem caucus (Goldberg, Kuffner, Jeter-Jackson, MacAvery, White-- plus Cons. Jim Doxsey) to agree to sign on unanimously to letter from yours truly urging Congress (especially Sen. Schumer and Rep. Scott Murphy) to join Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Barbara Boxer, along with Representatives John Hall, Maurice Hinchey, and over forty other members of Congress, to co-sponsor legislation to protect PACE programs from the July 2010 statement from the Federal Housing Finance Agency-- "The PACE Assessment Protection Act of 2010" (H.R. 5766/S. 3642)...

Thanks again to Hank Gross of MidHudsonNews.com for again for covering this:
"Dutchess Legislature Dems Ask President to Retain PACE Program"
http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2010/August/12/PACE_DC_Dems-12Aug10.html

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From National Association of Counties News (which each Co. Leg. receives in our mailbox).

"Energy-Efficiency Loan Program Set 'PACE' for Counties" by Charles Taylor [June 21, 2010]
http://lists.naco.org/CountyNewsTemplate.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=33973


Santa Fe County's program, Renew Santa Fe, has raised $10 million in private funding to begin as a pilot, according to Duncan Sill, the county's economic development director, who is in charge of the effort. That should be enough to fund 40-50 projects when the program ramps up later this year, he said.

Residential and commercial properties will be eligible for the loans. The county also intends to eventually sell "micro-bonds" in the $20,000 to $30,000 range, the proceeds from which will be used to make loans. Under most programs of this type, loans are capped at those amounts, or 10 percent of the home's value, whichever is lower.

St. Lucie County, Fla.'s nascent Solar Energy and Loan Fund (SELF) program takes a slightly different approach than Santa Fe's. Rather than selling bonds, it is creating a nonprofit "green" Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI). The county has $20 million in commitments from the banking community.

"We're able to avoid the bonding process by partnering with the financial institutions, and then they put the financial capital in for the loan funds," said Doug Coward, vice chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. The St. Lucie program will focus in three areas: energy conservation, energy efficiency upgrades and rooftop solar. The first two are a no-brainer, according to Coward: "It doesn't make a lot of sense to put solar photovoltaic on the roof if that new electricity is going out the window."

Programs like these put energy efficiency improvements within reach for lower income residents and the working poor, he added. A CDFI requires that 60 percent of the program's energy improvements be in low- and middle-income communities.

In addition, the SELF program will be able to offer lower interest rates than traditional PACE programs, whose interest payments can range from 8 percent to 10 percent, Coward said. Using the CDFI approach, the county's program will be able to offer interest rates of 4 percent to 5 percent.

St. Lucie County and the Santa Fe County are also using monies provided through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, which encourages such programs. Earlier this month, St. Lucie County was one of 20 jurisdictions nationwide awarded competitive grants from the U.S. Department of Energy's Energy Efficiency Block Grant Program (EECBG), receiving $2.9 million for its SELF program. Santa Fe County is using state energy program funds that were distributed by formula.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Here is actual letter I got Goldberg, Kuffner, Jeter-Jackson, MacAvery, White, and Doxsey to sign in August, directed to Congress:

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and forty-nine members of the House of Representatives wrote a letter to President Obama July 19th stating the following-- 'We are writing to express our strong support for the continuation of the innovative financing mechanism known as Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program; this innovative program will create jobs and make thousands of homes more energy-efficient.

The PACE program allows residential property owners, who may not have large amounts of capital on hand, to afford the up-front costs of a number of cost-effective improvements to their home. We request that the Federal Housing Finance Agency immediately publish revised guidelines that would allow PACE financing programs to continue while ensuring that both taxpayer and private mortgage investments are protected. Many Americans, states, and municipalities are counting on this program to be restored.'

Poughkeepsie's David Dell, Chair of Sustainable Hudson Valley, has determined that literally one billion dollars in savings on electric bills is possible over the next decade for Dutchess County homeowners and businesses if we succeeded in getting energy-efficiency retrofits into the hands of all who need them.

The towns of Babylon and Bedford, and the counties of Albany, Nassau, and Tompkins have taken meaningful steps towards setting up PACE programs. National Public Radio also recently reported that 'Sonoma County in California has loaned out $30 million for energy improvements to more than 1,000 homes and businesses since the program began a year and a half ago'-- creating jobs so far in just eighteen months.

Additionally, Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Barbara Boxer, along with Representatives John Hall, Maurice Hinchey, and over forty other members of Congress are co-sponsoring actual legislation to protect PACE programs from the July 2010 statement from the Federal Housing Finance Agency-- 'The PACE Assessment Protection Act of 2010' (H.R. 5766/S. 3642).

We, the undersigned seven members of the Dutchess County Legislature, strongly urge Congress to pass H.R. 5766/S. 3642 without further delay-- and for President Obama to sign it into law."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2010/August/12/PACE_DC_Dems-12Aug10.html ...

Dutchess Legislature Dems ask President to retain PACE program

POUGHKEEPSIE - The six Democrats and one Conservative on the Dutchess County Legislature have signed a letter to President Obama, Senator Charles Schumer and Congressman Scott Murphy asking them to support retention of the Property-Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program.

The program allows residential property owners who cannot afford upfront costs of making energy efficient improvements to their homes to perform them.
Dutchess County Legislator Joel Tyner is the impetus behind the local push to keep the legislation intact.

"Unfortunately the what happened on roughly July 7, the Federal Housing Finance Agency decided they wanted to kill PACE programs and this is really not a tolerable situation," he said.

So, Tyner and fellow Democrats Sandra Goldberg, Daniel Kuffner, Barbara Jeter-Jackson, Alison MacAvery and Steve White, along with Conservative James Doxsey, signed the letter.

They asked for Schumer and Murphy to co-sponsor the resolution to protect PACE programs along with Congressman John Hall and Maurice Hinchey and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, all of whom have already supported the effort.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.tompco.net/legislature/highlights/20100420.pdf ...

Highlights of the April 20, 2010 meeting of the Tompkins County Legislature

Sustainable Energy Financing Programs:

The Legislature by unanimous vote, asked the State to adopt pending legislation to "amend, strengthen, and correct technical deficiencies" within enabling legislation authorizing Sustainable Energy Financing Programs, which would allow the use of bonds and other sources of public and private financing to establish and implement such programs. The Tompkins County legislature last year supported the enabling legislation to establish such "green loan" programs for property owners for energy efficiency and renewable energy improvements, but indicates that broader sources of funding are needed than are permitted in the current legislation.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

[text here below of resolution #2010228 from me, Kuffner, Jeter-Jackson, MacAvery, and Doxsey-- that I was forced to pull from the agenda this summer when it was clear GOP still going to kill it; text here below is modeled word for word after resolution that passed Albany County Legislature unanimously in February(; again-- email all 25 of us at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us to get GOP off dime on this]

WHEREAS, by Chapter 497 of the laws of 2009, the State of New York authorized an amendment of the General Municipal Law by creating Article 5-L to allow municipalities to create Sustainable Energy Loan Programs to promote the deployment of renewable energy systems and energy efficiency improvement measures at residential and commercial properties, and

WHEREAS, the establishment of a Sustainable Energy Loan Program in Dutchess County would serve to assist in achieving statewide energy efficiency and renewable energy goals, reducing greenhouse emissions and mitigating the effect of global climate change and advance a clean energy economy, and

WHEREAS, a Sustainable Energy Loan Program would also bolster the economy of Dutchess County by saving county residents monies which they would otherwise spend on energy costs and by creating jobs for Dutchess County residents, and

WHEREAS, a Dutchess County Sustainable Energy Loan Program may create an opportunity for the County and State to obtain American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 ("ARRA") and/or other funding to support the program, and therefore be it

RESOLVED, that the Dutchess County Legislature hereby authorizes the Dutchess County Sustainable Energy Loan Program and requests that the Dutchess County Executive undertake all necessary steps to implement the Dutchess County Sustainable Energy Loan Program as authorized by Article 5-L of the General Municipal Law, and, be it further

RESOLVED, that the Clerk of the Dutchess County Legislature is directed to forward certified copies of this resolution to the appropriate County Officials.

help Alyssa Kogon counter Miller's lies, attacks-- stand up for democracy!...

Hi all...


The times I've phone-banked at Didi B HQ in Hyde Park (see http://www.DidiforSenate.com ), like others, I've also been mentioning Alyssa Kogon's campaign for the Assembly (and Scott Murphy too)...


But-- have you checked out http://www.Alyssa4Assembly.com lately?...


Priceless-- video online there of Miller's over-the-top performance debating Alyssa at the Poughkeepsie Journal-- as noted on Alyssa's website-- "if you need even more reasons to not vote for the incumbent, watch this Poughkeepsie Journal Debate video-- please note that the incumbent misrepresents himself, his voting record, and even his office expenses while being interviewed. He also calls the good people of the Fairview Tax District 'crackpots' and laughs when the name of a domestic violence victim is mentioned at the end of the tape"(!).....(check it out-- and fwd that video widely, folks-- same ol' Miller)....


Also-- crucial-- just got letter below from Alyssa-- please, folks-- dig into your pockets to help her now!...


[biggest reason I support Alyssa?...she joined Didi Barrett and I on Apr. 15th earlier this year for our Tax Day Rally for Main Street Not Wall Street-- unlike Miller, Alyssa for http://www.ABetterChoiceforNY.org !]


Pass it on...


Joel
444-0599/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

[scroll down just a bit for great recent letters to the editor from Carol Yakubowski and Jack Shackleton for Alyssa and Sept. 22nd column < Jonathan Smith; email letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com!]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:03:56 -0400

Subject: Final Push to Stop Joel Miller's Lies


From: Alyssa Kogon


Six months ago, I decided to run for the New York State Assembly - not because I am a politician by profession, but because Albany is broken and our current incumbent clearly isn't going to fix it.

My husband and I own a small business, and unlike New York State, we understand how to create jobs and work within a budget. I have worked for years as a therapy provider in local schools, because I care deeply about our communities. I couldn't stand by and watch more seniors be driven from their homes by property taxes, while New York State subsidizes Wall Street with $16 billion each year.


Since Spring, I have been going door to door and to community events to meet voters. This is a grassroots campaign, and the outpouring of support has been tremendous. From carrying petitions to knocking on doors with me, many of you have put your time and energy into this race, and we wouldn't be this close without you.


Now I need your help one more time.

With polling showing that we are in a very tight race, my opponent has resorted to blatantly lying to distract from his record - a record that includes voting to let domestic abusers carry guns and voting against the Fair Pay Act for women. After 16 years, he knows that voters are finally catching on, and he's panicking.

We need to make one last push if we are going to have enough money to set the record straight.

Please click here to help us raise at least $1000 online this week - your contribution of $25, $50, or $100 will let us reach voters to tell them the truth about Joel Miller's record of lies and personal attacks. It's time we stand up and fight back for Dutchess County.

Thank you for your support,


Alyssa Kogon

P.S. You can contribute online at http://www.actblue.com/page/stopmillerslies or send contributions to Alyssa for Assembly, 7 Stonehouse Road, Rhinebeck, NY, 12572.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20101012/OPINION02/10120306/Letters-to-the-editor-for-10-12-10


Letters to the editor for 10/12/10

OCTOBER 12, 2010

Kogon Dedicated To Community


Alyssa Kogon is running for the Assembly in the 102nd District. It is time for change and for allowing new ideas and individuals to represent us in the legislative halls of Albany.


Alyssa is a 25-year resident of Dutchess County and has successfully raised a family here. She and her husband operate a small business in the county. Alyssa is an avid community volunteer, teacher and music/art therapy provider. Her dedication to all people makes her especially qualified for this role. She will persevere for the working people of Dutchess County.


The incumbent is a 16-year professional politician. He sent more than $1 million to New York City private universities, including his own alma mater, Columbia University. Joel Miller co-sponsored two bills: One sent $420,000 to Columbia University, the other sent $630,000 to the NYU School of Dentistry. Joel Miller is a dentist by trade. Both schools are out of district, wealthy and private. Where are the bills from Mr. Miller to save our public schools as they close right here in Dutchess County?


In fact, while serving 16 years, Miller has passed only one bill, and that dealt with banking practices.

I encourage voters to support Alyssa Kogon's candidacy for Assembly in the 102nd District.

Carol Yakubowski
Clinton Hollow


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20101017/OPINION02/10170335/Letters-to-the-editor-8212-10-17


Letters to the editor - 10/17


OCTOBER 17, 2010

Miller Is Lacking In Accomplishments


The Poughkeepsie Journal Editorial Board seems to have bought into what Assemblyman Joel Miller has to say, rather than say anything about his performance over the last 16 years ("Joel Miller should get another Assembly term," Oct. 6). Surely he had some accomplishments, or did he?


None seems to be offered by the Journal. Could you enlighten me as to exactly what they are to qualify your endorsement? Why were none mentioned?


The editorial stated his personality characteristics and what is left to be done in Albany, including spending cuts, the MTA payroll tax and a bloated Medicaid program.


But all of this happened while Assemblyman Miller was in Albany. Is that any reason to send him back? How many chances does it take to get something done?


And while he is still given credit for his constituent services, they have deteriorated. No. It's time for somebody new and Alyssa Kogon is that person. The Poughkeepsie Journal provides the public a good service by interviewing candidates and getting them in the public eye before election.


But an opinion is just that - an opinion. I don't agree with this one, and I'm endorsing Alyssa Kogon. I hope you will join me as we need a change in Albany.

Jack Shackleton
Poughkeepsie


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[from Sept. 22nd The Hudson Valley News]


"Meet the Mendacious Mr. Miller"

by Jonathan Smith

Watching Assemblyman Joel Miller (R, C,I-Poughkeepsie) in his Poughkeepsie Journal debate against Democratic challenger Alyssa Kogon is like trying to follow the irrational logic of a cut-rate used-car salesman as he works diligently to sell you a clunker.

The interview had barely begun and Miller was already spouting half-truths. Kogon astutely pointed out that Miller's office costs the taxpayers of New York over $300,000 to run annually while he only brings back $112,000 in taxpayer money to spend in the district in the form of member items. Miller produced a piece of paper which he claimed demonstrated that his office only cost taxpayers $135,000.


However, New York State Assembly and Senate expenditure reports and the New York Comptroller's Office show Miller spent $306,166 last year on running his office. Miller's first lie of the day was an omission of over $171,000 in costs to taxpayers.

When the conversation steered toward the fact that Miller is ineffective as a representative of the 102nd Assembly District, Miller said, "As a Republican, I represent my district (against) a New York City-driven agenda. If someone supports that agenda, they are not helping their constituents, they are helping New York City." Kogon pointed out that Miller had sponsored taxpayer funds to be sent to his own alma mater, Columbia University, in New York City. Miller replied, "I never sponsored a bill to provide money for Columbia."


Yet the Empire Center for New York State Policy lists Joel Miller as a co-sponsor in 2008-09 of member items that sent $420,000 to Columbia University in support of its Dental Clinic Program. Interestingly enough, Miller is a retired dentist and a graduate of Columbia, so his nepotism makes sense in a peculiar way. How it does not make sense is that Miller should be using his member item funds to support his district, not his favorite university in New York City. The episode also demonstrates that Miller thinks nothing of flat-out lying to his constituents and the press as he works to send our hard-earned tax dollars to his old cronies.

[note from me here-- amen, JBS-- I found the same thing when I ran against Miller in 2002 and 2006-- still irks me, frankly, that Miller lied in an October 2006 Southern Dutchess News letter to the editor about how supposedly I supported legislation mandating annual well-testing for all homeowners-- far different from pushing for law for well-testing for VOC's when properties change hands...par for course]

But the most asinine moment of the debate came when Miller came when Miller tried to explain his way out of his vote against a law that would prohibit perpetrators of domestic violence from owning guns. Miller essentially claims that the bill would violate the rights of privacy for perpetrators of domestic violence and that even if you are not a domestic violence offender, the bogey man might come to get you anyway. Miller said, "Making an unusual noise. Under this bill, if you made an unusual noise in your home (and) since it embeds the family court act, you don't even have to be in a domestic situation, you make an unusual noise, you can't get a pistol permit, you have to forfeit your current pistol permit..."

To test Miller's hypothesis, I went downstairs to my living room, took a deep breath, prepared myself for the worst, and then made a loud, unusual noise. No ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearm) agents showed up at my door. Just to be sure, I made the same loud, unusual noise again. Nothing.

The exercise would have been ludicrous, but only as much so as Miller's ridiculous pontifications about this important bill.

In fact, the law (which passed in the Assembly) is very simple and directly targets violent domestic-abuse offenders, making it unlawful for them to possess firearms. The bill includes offenses outlined in Section 812 of the Family Court Act, such as harassment, sexual abuse, stalking and menacing one's domestic partner or children. Either Miller does not believe in protecting victims of domestic abuse or he has a grievance with the state law that protects them. Whatever the case may be, if Miller has his way, violent offenders will still be able to legally carry guns, making victims of domestic violence that much more susceptible to death at the hands of their abusers.

Democratic candidate for Assembly in the 102nd District Alyssa Kogon is a hard-working resident of our district and a great activist within our community. She has too many fine qualities to enumerate in this column, but in this instance, one stands out: she is truthful. She deserves to be our next assemblywoman as much as Miller deserves to be thrown out of office.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More re: Alyssa-- from http://www.Alyssa4Assembly.com ...

As the common-sense candidate, Alyssa Kogon knows there are easy solutions for some of the problems that are plaguing Dutchess County.

-No one should go to bed wondering whether their job will be there when they wake up.

-No one should have to make the choice of paying their taxes over putting food on the table.

-No one should send their child off to school wondering if they are getting the quality education they are entitled to.

By partially repealing the Stock Transfer Tax Rebate, New York State could virtually solve all of their economic problems. Every year, a tax is collected by New York State on all shares of stock that are traded. The rate is 5 cents per share. What happens to this money you may wonder? New York State gives it back to Wall Street! This year alone, 16 BILLION DOLLARS was handed back to the very same Wall Street that we as taxpayers just bailed out. This money is used for such things as bonuses for the executives who are already making huge salaries. If only a small portion of this rebate were kept by New York State, the fiscal deficit could be wiped out in just a few years time. In fact, until 1983 New York State did keep all or part of this rebate. Also, it is not a new tax. It has been in existence since the early 1900's. By holding back just twenty percent of this tax for a few years, New York State could keep our schools running as they should be, keep property taxes down, and pay off their loans. All of this, without squeezing more money from our over taxed citizens. It's time to Repeal The Rebate!

Alyssa is running for New York State Assembly in the 102nd district. This district encompasses the towns of Clinton, Hyde Park, Lagrange, Poughkeepsie, Wappinger, and Fishkill.

Government is too important to be left to the politiciansŠ

Alyssa Kogon is a long time resident and small business owner in Dutchess County. She has been an avid community activist and public servant in the Hudson Valley. Born January 26, 1961 in the Bronx, NY, Alyssa was raised in Westchester County and attended the public school system. Both of her parents were teachers and Alyssa, herself, went on to work in both the Hyde Park and Rhinebeck school systems. She attended the State University of New York College at Buffalo and graduated with a BA in 1983. This is where she met her husband of 23 years and Hudson Valley native, Lou. Upon graduation; Alyssa went onto a fashion career in New York City. However, she left her profession to move to the Hudson Valley and raise her two children Miranda and Samuel on the family farm in town of Clinton. Miranda is a recent graduate of SUNY Potsdam with an elementary education degree. Samuel is currently attending SUNY School of Environmental Science and Forestry as an environmental biology major. Alyssa's husband Lou is owner of both Kogon's Paving and Kogon Realty of the Hudson Valley.

[note: for more on this see http://www.petitiononline.com/stocktax ; http://www.ABetterChoiceforNY.org !]

As chairwoman of the Town of Clinton Democrats, former trustee of the Clinton Community Library and board member of a local non-profit E4 (a charitable organization), Alyssa is a community leader. Alyssa is both a volunteer and professional in the developmentally challenged and senior citizen communities. She is a music and art therapy provider for such local resources as New Horizons, Devereux Foundation, The Lutheran Care Center, The Vassar Warner Home, and Ferncliff Nursing Home. As a parent, Alyssa spent many years as a substitute teacher in her own children's schools and still works for Rhinebeck Central School District in this capacity. She was an enthusiastic volunteer, PTA member, classroom mother and program director in her local districts.

Alyssa believes in a common sense, not nonsense, approach to government. She brings with her the knowledge that there are sensible solutions for quality education, jobs and a balanced budget in Albany. Working for the people, and not an ideology, Alyssa will bring an innovative approach to tackling Dutchess County's economic and education problems.

Contact Information:

Alyssa Kogon
7 Stonehouse Road
Rhinebeck, NY 12572
kogon4assembly@gmail.com
Home: (845)876-7539
Cell: (845)546-4215

neat way here to hold banks accountable locally-- let's do this!...

Hi all...


[tired of reading about L.A., et. al. signing on to http://www.MoveYourMoney.info ?...time for Dutchess!!!]

I held a press conference earlier today to discuss legislation submitted by yours truly today to Co. Leg. offices-- for a new responsible banking practices initiative for Dutchess County to help local small businesses struggling and homeowners still trying to avert foreclosure-- by holding local financial institutions publicly responsible for their level of commitment to our communities, as even the Northern Dutchess Alliance recently suggested in its "Blueprint for Economic Development" (scroll down for resolution; also see http://www.northerndutchess.org/images/NDABlueprintWeb.pdf ]


Specifically, the proposal from yours truly (modeled after Los Angeles and Philadelphia) strongly urges the Dutchess County Finance Department to prioritize Dutchess County's monies for the top 25% of local financial institutions ranked in four categories: residential lending, lending to small businesses, community reinvestment, and charitable/philanthropic giving; the financial institutions ranked in the middle 50% to continue to get some business from the County of Dutchess, and the financial institutions in the bottom 25% to be divested from completely of Dutchess County funds...


[note-- scroll to bottom for recent letter on this from Sarah Brennan, Policy Deputy for L.A. City Council; let us know if you want to see two attachments sent by Sarah to us-- legislation for City of Los Angeles]


[note, too-- it's not just LA or Philly-- City of Carson, CA Treasurer Karen Avilla has gotten her city to "Move the Money" and implement responsible banking practices-- and co-sponsored a Responsible Banking resolution before CA League of Cities w/LA City Councilman Richard Alarcón; see:
http://www.cacities.org/resource_files/29146.RT%20Agenda%20Pkt%209_2010.pdf ]


Agree?...Send a letter to all 25 of us in Co. Leg. now-- at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us, folks!...


Much more information on all this here below:


"Los Angeles Pushes for Responsible Banking" by Dennis Santiago [3/5/10]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-santiago/los-angeles-pushes-for-re_b_488126.html .


"L.A. Votes to Move Its Money" [3/5/10]
http://moveyourmoney.info/archives/1537


"NY Communities is fighting against banks that readily accepted tax payer money and continue to refuse mortgage modifications for struggling homeowners. On July 13th, 2010, NYCC teamed up with the United Federation of Teachers, TWU, SEIU Local 1199, City Comptroller John Liu among others to send a letter to five of the biggest banks in the country demanding they do more mortgage modifications to help families avoid foreclosure. If the banks fail to act, all parties involved could move their pension funds and bank deposits to other institutions."
[see: http://www.NYCommunities.org/foreclosure ]


"L.A. Wants to Quit or Alter Two Bank Deals" by David Zahniser
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/10/local/la-me-rate-swaps10-2010mar10


[one of many websites proving there are far too homes in Dutchess still affected by foreclosure:
http://www.foreclosuredatabank.com/lview.php?state=NY&county=Dutchess ]


Fact: "According the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, the average foreclosure costs $77,935 while preventing a foreclosure runs $3,300. The homeowner has a typical loss of $7,200 which includes loss of equity in the property, moving expenses, and perhaps some legal fees. Those neighbors living in close proximity to the foreclosed house suffer $1,508 in losses from the decrease in the value of their own home as the neighborhood begins to deteriorate. The local government loses $19,227 through diminished taxes and fees and a shrinking tax base as home prices decrease. That leaves us with total costs of $50,000 for the lender under the numbers produced by the Joint Economic Committee of Congress."
[from "Foreclosures Cost Lenders, Homeowners, the Community Big Bucks" by Glenn Setzer (6/2/08)
http://www.mortgagenewsdaily.com/622008_Foreclosure_Costs.asp ]


Fact: "Just to keep up on the property, including utilities, sewer and water services, upkeep and maintenance, and property taxes, local governments lose an average of $20,000 per foreclosed house."
[from "$20,000 in Property Tax and Other Revenue Lost to Each Foreclosure"
http://www.articlealley.com/article_1021347_19.html by Nick Adama (8/7/09)]


[again: if you want to move Dutchess on this before 2525-- email countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!]


Pass it on...


Joel
444-0599/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

[hopefully at least my own caucus will embrace this-- but if they don't-- 'tis one more reason to join 119 others on board already at my "Dutchess Progressive" group online @ Facebook-- fwd along, folks; way too many good, progressive ideas around that Dutchess shouldn't have to wait 'til 2525 to do here!]


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[text here below of resolution submitted to Co. Leg.; email countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us now!!!]


WHEREAS, the homeowners and small businesses of Dutchess County need every bit of help they can get from Dutchess County and local financial institutions in order to be able to survive and thrive now in the worst recession in the last seventy years; far too many small businesses have gone under and far too many homes have been foreclosed on locally, and


WHEREAS, each foreclosed home ends up costing Dutchess County taxpayers literally tens of thousands of dollars, and


WHEREAS, the Northern Dutchess Alliance's "Blueprint for Economic Development" recommends that local financial institutions be held publicly responsible and accountable for their demonstrated level of commitment to our local communities, and


WHEREAS, with an annual budget approximating $400 million annually, Dutchess County keeps millions of dollars in various local financial institutions each year, and


WHEREAS, the Los Angeles City Council recently provided a great model for Dutchess County by voting unanimously this March to pass a responsible banking practices motion, based on similar legislation passed in 2006 in Philadelphia, setting Los Angeles on a path to require banks doing business with the City, or seeking to do business with the City, to report on the details of their local reinvestment in the community, tying a bank's involvement in the community to contracts for the City's operating funds and pension programs worth $28 billion, and


WHEREAS, Los Angeles' legislation calls for an updated approach to measuring banks, along the lines of a locally focused version of the Community Reinvestment Act, with special near-term emphasis on tracking foreclosure prevention and outreach to unbanked and underbanked persons, and a review of previous agreements reached with financial institutions in the past, and


WHEREAS, specifically, the City of Los Angeles will soon be prioritizing its municipal funds to the top 25% of local financial institutions ranked in four categories: residential lending, lending to small businesses, community reinvestment, and charitable/philanthropic giving; the financial institutions ranked in the middle 50% will continue to get some business from the City of Los Angeles, and the financial institutions in the bottom 25% will be divested from of city funds, and


RESOLVED, that the Dutchess County Legislature strongly urges the Dutchess County Finance Department to follow the good example of the City of Los Angeles and prioritize Dutchess County's monies for the top 25% of local financial institutions ranked in four categories: residential lending, lending to small businesses, community reinvestment, and charitable/philanthropic giving; the financial institutions ranked in the middle 50% to continue to get some business from the County of Dutchess, and the financial institutions in the bottom 25% will be divested from of Dutchess County funds, and be it further


RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to Dutchess County Executive William Steinhaus and Dutchess County Finance Commissioner Pamela Barrack.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dennis-santiago/los-angeles-pushes-for-re_b_488126.html ...


Dennis Santiago
CEO and Managing Director of IRA
Posted: March 5, 2010 05:44 PM


Los Angeles Pushes for Responsible Banking

Another landmark piece of legislation was passed today.

The City Council of Los Angeles voted 12-0 to pass Councilman Richard Alarcon's motion 09-0234, also known as the "responsible banking practices" motion. This will set the City on a path to require banks doing business with the City, or seeking to do business with the City, to report on the details of their local reinvestment in the community. The ordinance to be drafted will tie a bank's involvement in the community to contracts for the City's operating funds and pension programs worth up to $28.9 billion dollars.

The legislative template, based on a 2006 act by the City of Philadelphia, calls for an updated approach to measuring banks, along the lines of a locally focused version of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), with special near-term emphasis on tracking foreclosure prevention and outreach to unbanked and underbanked persons. The ordinance also calls for a review of certain swap agreements entered into by the City in the past.

Unlike New Mexico's initiative to shift its funds to local banks within state, the Los Angeles law doesn't preclude any bank, large or small, from doing business with the city. Instead, it places a premium on banks that can deliver tangible proof that they are locally involved. Both approaches are designed to concentrate the local circulation of money.

Alarcon took up the motion as Agenda Item #11 for the day, starting with a short public hearing limiting speakers, including myself, to one minute statements. All oral statements given to Council were supportive. Rising rather eloquently to speak in support of the Alarcon measure were councilmembers Janice Hahn, Ed Reyes, Paul Koretz, fellow Jobs and Business Development Committee member Bernard Parks, and finally Tom LaBonge. Interestingly, LaBonge referenced the metaphor of George Bailey versus Mr. Potter that the Move Your Money campaign used in its video introduction.

After accepting a few friendly amendments calling on the city staff to make sure to cross all t's and dot all i's, Council Alarcon called for the vote. The electronic screen indicated a straight up, unanimous yes vote.

You don't see truly groundbreaking events like this very often. This template -- the effort of a major U.S. city to codify how measuring "investing local" works as a means to leverage local economies -- represents a major systemic step as governments awaken to the need to ensure regional economies are sustainable in the 21st Century. Everyone on the planet should study it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.NYCommunities.org/foreclosure ...

If you travel a just few miles away from Wall St. the world's financial capital, you will find yourself in the neighborhoods of St. Albans in Queens, or Bed-Stuy in Brooklyn where homeowners have been forced to make impossible choices between keeping up with their skyrocketing mortgage payments and providing their families with the bare essentials.

NY Communities is fighting against banks that readily accepted tax payer money and continue to refuse mortgage modifications for struggling homeowners. We need REAL financial reform that protects families, not CEO's, communities not Wall St.


On July 13th, 2010, NYCC teamed up with the United Federation of Teachers, TWU, SEIU Local 1199, City Comptroller John Liu among others to send a letter to five of the biggest banks in the country demanding they do more mortgage modifications to help families avoid foreclosure. If the banks fail to act, all parties involved could move their pension funds and bank deposits to other institutions.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


From http://moveyourmoney.info/archives/1537 ...


L.A. VOTES TO MOVE ITS MONEY
Posted March 5th 2010 at 3:14 pm by admin


The Los Angeles City Council has voted to move its money out of banks that fail to protect citizens from losing their homes. Dennis Santiago was in the room at the time and reports:


* Another landmark piece of legislation was passed today.

* The City Council of Los Angeles voted 12-0 to pass Councilman Richard Alarcon's motion 09-0234, also known as the "responsible banking practices" motion. This will set the City on a path to require banks doing business with the City, or seeking to do business with the City, to report on the details of their local reinvestment in the community. The ordinance to be drafted will tie a bank's involvement in the community to contracts for the City's operating funds and pension programs worth up to $28.9 billion dollars.


The bill creates a "report card" that evaluates banks looking to do business with the city based on their record on mortgage modifications and small business lending, among other things. Banks that do not meet the standard would not receive city funds.

The Associated Press's Rachel Beck reports:


* If the banks don't comply, they risk getting replaced by banks that do. The price for getting tossed: Lost access to nearly $30 billion in city savings and pension funds.
*
* "We need to challenge the financing institutions that got us into this mess," says Richard Alarcon, a Democrat who introduced the city council's motion that passed 12-0 earlier this month. "Responsible local investments are critical for our economy."


* Think of what's happening as a reward system for any banks that are willing to help Los Angeles's population of 3.8 million.

This means that Los Angeles has chosen to use its money to help its own communities instead of abusive banks. Way to go everyone!


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:49:38 -0700
Subject: City of LA Responsible Banking
From: Sarah Brennan
To: joeltyner@earthlink.net

1. Here's where we're at with the Responsible Banking Ordinance timeline:

It will be heard next Tuesday, Oct. 26th in Committee at 1 PM in Room 1010, City Hall
From Committee, any amendments the Committee approves to the City Attorney's office draft ordinance will be transmitted to Council for the final vote


The final vote will take place on Wed., Nov. 10th or Friday, Nov. 12th in Council (depending on when it can be agendized, given other City business)
2. Here's where we're at with the Responsible Banking Draft Ordinance itself:

Attached is the original draft Ordinance submitted for the Committee's consideration by the City Attorney's office


Also attached is the NEW draft ordinance (redlined version of the City Attorney's draft) that our office is moving to substitute in Committee next week. We had two main goals in mind when amending: adding 1. Clarity and 2. Specificity to the old draft in order to make sure that the Ordinance, if passed, does what it's intended to do.
I've also attached a Draft Ordinance Outline. This should be helpful in giving people the Cliff's Note version of what's in our substitute draft ordinance and where.
3. Substance of Proposed Amendments (in brief):

1. Disclosure of Information Now More Detailed
On pages 2-4, the criteria requested from banks is clarified. One of the many sources we considered in making these changes, fyi, is the City of Cleveland's similar ordinance, which has been in place since 1991 and is available here: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/clevelandcodes/cco_part1_178.html

2. Calculation of Community Reinvestment Score Now More Detailed
On page 5, how the score should be calculated is more explicit than it was previously.

3. Bid Preference for Bond Business, not just City Depositories
If an institution that is applying for bond business has retail banking business such as: home lending, commercial lending, and/or community development lending, it will also be subject to the Community Reinvestment Score. (The score will still be conducted by the Treasurer). This is consistent with the Committee's expressed intention of including the banking business the City engages in, not just City depository business and is important because the City does hundreds of millions, if not billions, worth of bond business each year.



--
Sarah Brennan
Policy Deputy
Office of Councilmember Richard Alarcón
Los Angeles City Council, District 7
City Hall, Rm. 470, Los Angeles, CA 90012
(213) 847-7777 office
(213) 847-0707 fax
(818) 427-4311 blackberry
sarah.brennan@lacity.org

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

gerrymander-crazy Dutchess GOP even to right of Paladino re: redistricting!...

Hi all...


Yep-- you read that headline right, folks...


Believe it or not, our County Legislature's GOP majority is getting ready to undo Bill McCabe's independent redistricting legislation Dem majority passed in '09(!)...(GOP bill placed on desks Weds.)...


[scroll down; also see: http://www.lagrangedemocrats.com/e_newsletters/july2007/redistricting.htm ]


Fact: Independent redistricting has long been top priority for Common Cause, NYLWV, and NYPIRG; see:
http://www.commoncause.org/ny/redistricting ; http://www.nypirg.org/goodgov/reformny/redist.html ;
http://www.lwvny.org/advocacy/education/RedistrictingReform%20Paper_1010.pdf ; 10/5 piece below.


Fact: Even Carl Paladino (ack; where's my doggie bag) has come out for independent redistricting(!); see:
http://www.lohud.com/article/20101005/NEWS05/10050316/New-York-watchdog-groups-want-to-take-redistricting-away-from-lawmakers .


Note, too-- stopping GOP gerrymandering from Saland et. al. is yet one more reason to have solid, progressive, Dem leadership in state legislature!...make calls, canvass @ http://www.DidiforSenate.com HQ for whole Dem ticket-- call 233-5577 for info-- all hands on deck now for http://Alyssa4Assembly.com ,
http://www.KevinCahillNY.com , http://www.SkartadosforAssembly.com , http://www.MikeKaplowitz.com ,
http://www.SusanTookerforAssembly.com , http://www.VoteTully.com -- and election shenanigans/games from GOP judges are one more reason why we need to help send folks like David Steinberg and Marco Caviglia into office!...see: http://www.JudgeSteinberg.com ; http://www.CavigliaforJudge.com ; pass it on...


[...update soon re: http://www.Alyssa4Assembly.com -- re: obnoxious, out-of control, over-the-top Miller!...]


Finally, scroll down just a bit to see full text of the independent redistricting legislation Dem majority passed in '09 (thx much to work of Bill McCabe and Fred Bunnell on this-- that now GOP want to undo)...


[call Co. Leg. offices at 486-2100 directly to get sent copy of disgusting GOP legislation to destroy this!]


And-- most importantly-- hold Dutchess GOP accountable!...email countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us...


[pass it on!]


Joel
444-0599/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Here-- proof that Dutchess GOP actually to the right of racist/sexist/homophobe idiot Paladino on this(!)...


New York watchdog groups want to take redistricting away from lawmakers

BY JOSEPH SPECTOR * ALBANY BUREAU CHIEF * OCTOBER 5, 2010


http://www.lohud.com/article/20101005/NEWS05/10050316/New-York-watchdog-groups-want-to-take-redistricting-away-from-lawmakers


ALBANY - From 1982 to 2008, nearly 3,000 state legislative general elections were held in New York. Only 39 incumbents, slightly more than 1 percent, lost.

The reason, good-government groups said Monday: Uncompetitive district lines that make it exceedingly difficult for a challenger in the opposing party to defeat an incumbent.

"We've been doing this for 30 years now, but we think this year, because of the anti-incumbency anger, because of the fact that people appear to want more competitive elections, this is our window of opportunity," said Barbara Bartoletti, legislative director for the state League of Women Voters.

The effort has been aided separately this year by the group New York Uprising, led by former New York Mayor Ed Koch. The group has received pledges from more than 300 state legislators and candidates to support independent redistricting if they are elected.


New York Uprising has also secured pledges from the gubernatorial candidates, Democrat Andrew Cuomo and Republican Carl Paladino.

"Redistricting impacts on competitive elections in New York to the extent that we think is a problem. We think it's a system that needs to be changed," said Blair Horner, legislative director for the New York Public Interest Research Group.

NYPIRG, the League of Women Voters and other watchdog groups are making a push this election year to get lawmakers to agree to an independent redistricting commission next year. The goal would be to take the drawing of district lines out of lawmakers' hands, which in New York has meant the parties in power shape the districts to keep their majorities.

In advance of Election Day, Nov. 2, the groups plan to hold public meetings across the state to educate voters and lobby lawmakers to endorse an independent redistricting panel. The new lines must be drawn before the 2012 legislative elections.

District lines for state and congressional seats are redrawn every 10 years based on new census data.

In a report released Monday, the groups found that in 2002 - the last time the lines were drawn - only 25 of the 212 state legislative districts, 12 percent, were drawn to have a similar number of major party enrollments.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Recall-- from http://www.lagrangedemocrats.com/e_newsletters/july2007/redistricting.htm ...


Redistricting Resolution

Press Release

From Legislators McCabe and Bunnell


In response to calls for reform in government and the need for elected governing bodies to be more responsive to people who elect them, Dutchess County Legislators McCabe and Bunnell have submitted a resolution to amend the Dutchess County Charter to change the way that boundaries for legislative districts are determined after each federal census.

The change calls for the formation of a 5-member Advisory Committee to recommend district boundaries to the Legislature. Two members would be named by the majority caucus of the Legislature, two members by the minority caucus, and those four would choose a fifth member to serve as Chair of the Committee. None of the members would be currently elected to public office and would not currently hold any party position.

The proposal is similar to plans being put before the NY State Assembly and Senate, and has some similarities to plans being put forth for other County Legislatures in New York State.

The Committee's criteria, in descending order of importance, would be: population equity, contiguity, unity of villages and towns, and compactness. Any plan for district lines would be subject to vote by the full Legislature.

Legislators McCabe and Bunnell have the support of other legislators and hope that it will be on the agenda for discussion in November's meeting.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


[here below-- what first Dem Co. Leg. majority in 30 years passed last year (GOP soon to destroy this bill-- unless you all-- we all-- raise enough hell in grass roots!)]

RESOLUTION NO. 209167

RE: LOCAL LAW NO. 4 OF 2009 A LOCAL LAW AMENDING THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CHARTER AS IT PERTAINS TO SECTION 2.01, COUNTY LEGISLATURE; MEMBERSHIP; ELECTION; TERM; REAPPORTIONMENT

Legislators MCCABE, HIGGINS, WASSELL, TYNER, FETTES, NASH, KELLER-COFFEY, JETTER-JACKSON, KUFFNER, MACAVERY, MANSFIELD, DOXSEY, FLESLAND, and HORTON offer the following and move its adoption:


RESOLVED, that this Legislature of the County of Dutchess adopt Local Law No. 4 of 2009, which has been submitted this day for consideration by said Legislature.

LOCAL LAW NO. 4 OF 2009

RE: A LOCAL LAW AMENDING THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CHARTER AS IT PERTAINS TO SECTION 2.01, COUNTY LEGISLATURE; MEMBERSHIP; ELECTION; TERM; REAPPORTIONMENT

BE IT ENACTED by the County Legislature of the County of Dutchess as follows:

SECTION 1: LEGISLATIVE INTENT:

Each citizen of Dutchess County should be assured equal and fair representation on the County Legislature. The Dutchess County Legislature provides for a reapportionment process, after each federal census that should fairly revise the boundaries of Legislative Districts recognizing the criteria of: 1) population equality; 2) contiguity; 3) unity of villages and towns; and 4) compactness. The process for reapportionment should be accomplished in a timely and fair manner. The County Legislature has determined that Section 2.01 of the County Charter of the County of Dutchess should be amended to provide for a Reapportionment Advisory Committee.

SECTION 2: AMENDMENT TO THE DUTCHESS COUNTY CHARTER:

Section 2.01 of the Charter of the County of Dutchess shall be amended to read as follows:

Section 2.01. County Legislature: Membership; Election; Term; Reapportionment.
(a) There shall be a County Legislature composed of Legislators elected from single member districts prescribed in such local laws of reapportionment as may from time to time be applicable. Each Legislator shall be deemed a County Officer and shall be elected at a general odd-numbered year election for a term of two years. At the time of nomination and election, and throughout the term of office, each Legislator shall be and remain an elector of the district from which he or she is elected.

(b) Hereafter, the County Legislature, by local law subject to permissive referendum, shall reapportion its membership within nine months after the publication of each federal decennial census in a manner consistent with constitutionally and legally accepted principles of legislative representation, but in no event shall the number of Legislators exceed twenty-five (25).

(c) Dutchess County Legislative District Boundaries shall be recommended by an advisory committee consisting of five (5) members, two of whom shall be appointed by the Majority Caucus and two of whom shall be appointed by the Minority Caucus. Upon the affirmative vote of no less than three such advisory committee members they shall select a fifth member to serve as its chairperson. No more than two members shall be of the same political party. No member of the advisory committee shall be employed by or hold any elected or appointed office and no member shall be an officer of any political party. The Legislative staff shall provide technical assistance for the committee sufficient to support its reasonable and necessary activities. Vacancies on the committee shall be filled in the same manner that the initial appointment was made. No member of the committee shall run for the Legislature within two years after serving as a member of the committee.

(d) The Advisory Committee shall consider as criteria the constitutionally and legally acceptable principles of representation, and it shall consider the following factors:

1. Population Equity.
2. Contiguity.
3. Unity of Villages and Towns.
4. Compactness.

(e) The Advisory Committee shall be formed no later than two (2) months after publication of each regular federal census. The Advisory Committee may conduct meetings and hearings at any place in Dutchess County as it deems necessary, shall keep records of its proceedings, and shall report from time to time to the Chairman of the County Legislature detailing the state of its progress. Within six (6) months of publication of the results of each regular federal census, the Advisory Committee shall submit to the County Legislature its recommendations for changes in the boundaries of Legislative Districts. The Advisory Committee's recommendations shall be in the form of a plan of redistricting. The Advisory Committee may submit one or more plans for consideration by the County Legislature, and a majority of the County Legislature may reject, adopt, or amend and adopt, a submitted plan. A majority of the County Legislature may also return a plan to the Advisory Committee with a list of objections for the Advisory Committee's consideration in forming a revised plan. Should the County Legislature return a plan to the Advisory Committee, the Advisory Committee shall have one (1) month to submit a revised plan. Should the Advisory Committee fail to submit a plan within the deadlines contained in this paragraph, the Advisory Committee is discharged and a majority of the County Legislature may adopt a plan of redistricting notwithstanding any work product or recommendations of the Advisory Committee.

(f) The members of the Advisory Committee shall serve without compensation and shall serve at the pleasure of their respective appointing authority. Each Advisory Committee shall expire thirty (30) days after the County Legislature has approved revisions in the boundaries of the Legislative Districts. If appropriate and legal revisions of the boundaries of Legislative Districts are not adopted by the County Legislature within nine (9) months of the publication of the results of the federal census, then the County Attorney is directed to make application to a court of appropriate jurisdiction for the appointment of a Special Master to prepare a redistricting plan for the Legislative Districts containing substantially equal citizen population and such other factors as required by law.


(g) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Charter to the contrary, such local law of reapportionment shall not be subject to disapproval by the County Executive but shall be subject to permissive referendum.

SECTION 3: SEPARABILITY:

If any part or provision of this Local Law or the application thereof to any person or circumstances be adjudged invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall be confined in its operation to the part of the provision or application directly involved in the controversy in which judgment shall have been rendered and shall not affect or impair the validity of the remainder of this Local Law or the application thereof to other persons or circumstances, and the Dutchess County Legislature hereby declares that it would have passed this Local Law or the remainder thereof had such invalid application or invalid provision been apparent.

SECTION 4: EFFECTIVE DATE:

This Local Law shall take effect upon compliance with the applicable provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Law.

more fun 'n games courtesy of Co. Leg. GOP-- expose 'em, folks!...

Hi all...


Many times over past few years local media quoted GOP/Rolison re: "open government/transparency"...


The facts, however (10 of 'em below), from GOP's reign of error this year speak otherwise-- see below...


And on that note-- check out this latest piece on Co. Leg. from MidHudsonNews.com this morning:


"Dutchess Lawmakers Hear 2009 Audit Report"
http://www.midhudsonnews.com/News/2010/October/19/DC_audit-19Oct10.html


[interesting: tho Price Waterhouse and Coopers have long audited Dutchess, first Co. Leg. presentation]


Of course, GOP county legislators took the opportunity to beat up on public sector-- re: pension costs...


[while ignoring how we middle-class NY'ers now pay over 11% of our income in state and local taxes-- millionaires still paying only 8%; ignoring how millionaires used to pay a 15 1/2% NY income tax rate in 70's under Rockefeller but now pay only 8.97%; ignoring how even the Wall Street Journal reported that the richest 1% of us have more wealth than the other 90%; ignoring how Wall Street firms made $61` billion in profits last year (triple the previous record) ignoring how even the Wall Street Journal reports that 70% of economy driven by consumer demand; ignoring massive Better Choice Budget coalition--
http://www.ABetterChoiceforNY.org ; http://www.itepnet.org/wp2009/ny_whopays_factsheet.pdf ; http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/taxhistory2.htm ; http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/01/08/plutonomics/ ;
http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20100328/FREE/303289966 ;
http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/facts/capitalism-love-story GOP echo Molinaro bent on this]


[did FDR get us out of Depression with budget cuts, layoffs, union-busting?...no!...wake up, Dutchess!]


[...and-- get a load of this one (ever see this on front page of PoJo?)...two years ago Price Waterhouse Coopers actually said this-- "We recommend that Dutchess County dedicate the appropriate level of internal resources or consider outsourcing the financial statement preparation process"(!)...(besides also discovering recently that our county Social Services Dept.'s books off by $5.8 million as well!)...]


But more to the point here...


Perhaps you'd like to view the webcast of last night's Budget, Finance, and Personnel Comm. mtg.?...


Well, you can't-- there is none(!)...(see http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=dutchess for yourself)...


[no coincidence that GOP shot down my initiative this month for Co. Leg. mtg.'s to be videotaped, either]


That's not all though-- here's a list of ten censored facts re: Dutchess GOP reign of error in 2010:


[email 25 of us on these at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us; letters to editor needed after election!]


Fact #1: GOP didn't webcast last Tuesday's DCRRA public hearing re: SWMP plan for next decade.
[ http://www.DCRRA.org -- contrary to Rolison lie, Rolison would not allow a hearing in Leg. Chambers]


Fact #2: GOP didn't allow resolution on to fall agenda for VINE notification endorsed by Dem caucus.
[ http://www.VineLink.com ; http://www.4Survivors.blogspot.com -- thx to DiBari, Kogon, Kuffner, et. al.]


Fact #3: GOP wouldn't allow questions last Weds. from legislators regarding domestic violence report.
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20101015/NEWS05/10150347/Committee-Domestic-abuse-is-on-the-rise-budget-cuts-impede-services-put-lives-at-risk&template=artsemantics&server=MOC-WN0490


Fact #4: GOP wouldn't allow public comment this fall at mtg. w/DCRRA, Coughlan (as earlier in spring).
[ http://www.dailyfreeman.com/articles/2010/09/05/news/doc4c831e4dabf9f174964697.txt ]


Fact #5: GOP killed online county budget survey idea this month (I'm doing one @ SurveyMonkey.com).
[ http://www.co.sauk.wi.us/accountingpage/sauk-county-line-budget-survey ;
http://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/ ; http://www.8newsnow.com/global/story.asp?s=12210251 ]


Fact #6: GOP wouldn't even allow legislators to comment this month on resolution for mtg.'s videotaped.
[both Cablevision, Time-Warner profitable: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUKN0410275020100805 ;
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704370704575228052080463886.html ]


Fact #7: GOP wouldn't allow Canadian Rx option on agenda in Oct.-- Rensselaer GOP doing this tho.
[ http://www.PetitionOnline.com/SaveOnRx ; GOP Rensselaer County Exec Jimino has embraced this]


Fact #8: GOP killed student leadership summit resolution early this spring for more student input for us.
[ http://www.NSLCLeaders.org -- would be great for Dutchess students to suggest ideas for Co. Leg.]


Fact #9: GOP killed Cortlandt-style home heating oil discount program that could have saved $ for us.
[ http://www.townofcortlandt.com/cit-e-access/news/index.cfm?NID=12528&TID=20&jump2=0 ]


Fact #10: GOP killed county health insurance option for municipalities-- could have saved $3M/yearly.
[ http://whcu870.com/pages/8011398.php?contentType=4&contentId=6717548 even L. Hitsman for this]


Hold 'em accountable, folks-- tell 'em to cut the garbage-- at countylegislators@co.dutchess.ny.us!...


[sad but true-- things will just get worse unless you all hold their feet to fire; no local media interest, seemingly, in exposing any of this-- quel surprise]

Pass it on...


Joel
444-0599/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

p.s. And this is all besides GOP county legislators like Rob Weiss openly mocking and disrespecting (as he did at end of last Weds.' full board Co. Leg. mtg.) public officials like Co. Leg. Jim Doxsey, joking that perhaps Doxsey was high on "synthetic cannabinoids"-- merely because Doxsey had guts and moxie at that mtg. to bring up an issue I had emailed you all on back on Oct. 5th-- how ridiculously unfair and undemocratic it is that only Dem resolution on agenda this month (2010229) was made to look as if it is unprofessional-- while all 17 other resolutions from GOP have been made to look more professional(!)...


[2010229 was for for greatly increased recycling here in Dutchess to move county towards zero-waste-- see: http://www.dutchessny.gov/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/ResolutionsPDF/2010229.pdf ; see full agenda: http://www.co.dutchess.ny.us/CountyGov/Departments/Legislature/CLagenda.htm ]


[watch webcast of Weiss idiocy yourself-- http://www.totalwebcasting.com/view/?id=dutchess ; fwd on]


p.p.s. Friday is deadline-- 150-word election-oriented letter: letterstoeditor@poughkeepsiejournal.com:
http://www.DidiforSenate.com , http://Alyssa4Assembly.com , http://www.KevinCahillNY.com , http://www.SkartadosforAssembly.com , http://www.MikeKaplowitz.com ,
http://www.SusanTookerforAssembly.com , http://www.VoteTully.com , http://www.JudgeSteinberg.com , http://www.CavigliaforJudge.com , http://www.HincheyforCongress.org , http://www.ScottMurphyforCongress.com , http://www.JohnHallforCongress.com -- need your support!...

Sunday, October 17, 2010

just say no to property tax cap pandering-- and yes to real reform-- a circuitbreaker!...

Hi all...

As usual, today's PoJo editorial echoes Grover Norquist (Mr. Shrink-Government-to-Drown-in-Tub):

[for actual text of editorial click here:
http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/article/20101017/OPINION01/10170318/Editorial--State-Assembly-should-end-delay-and-vote-on-tax-cap ]

Unfortunately, it once again echoes the common GOP/right-wing pablum about how supposedly a property tax circuitbreaker is "not viable" because "more budget cuts or tax on rich would be necessary to pay for it"-- and that "the state is not in a position to do that now" due to "dire fiscal condition"...

What a load of hooey-- see http://www.TrendNY.org (poll after poll: NY'ers for circuitbreaker tax reform!).

[recall recent powerful statement from Rhinebeck School Boardmember Deirdre Burns against tax cap; kudos to Didi Barrett for also making clear @ that Bread Alone gathering her knowledge of CA tax cap!]

Check out these eight reasons why NYS shouldn't destroy our school system as CA and MA have:

[text here just below is directly from the Fiscal Policy Institute-- see http://www.FiscalPolicy.org !]

New York Shouldn't Look to Massachusetts as a Model for Property Tax Reform
With the Commission on Property Tax Relief recommending that the state impose a rigid cap on property taxes for education based on Massachusetts' Proposition 2, a report from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (May 21, 2008) describes the problems the law has created in Massachusetts and explains that the impact in New York could be even more severe.

Among the key lessons:

* A tax cap won't make government services cost less.

* Claims that caps will produce large savings through "efficiencies" are overblown.

* Tax caps can be particularly harmful if adopted during a weak economy.

* State aid can't be relied upon to fill the gap.

* Changes in school enrollment can have a big impact.

* Without effectively targeted state aid, low-income communities will fall even further behind.

* Wealthier communities will override a tax cap more frequently than poorer ones.

* Middle-income communities might end up bearing the brunt of a cap.

Check out this must-read on all this from Ron Deutsch of http://www.ABetterChoiceforNY.org :

"Circuit Breaker the Best Way to Limit Property Tax Impact" (Albany TimesUnion 8/2/08)
http://www.trendny.org/Timesunion.com_Aug_08.pdf !

Also-- recall this from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities May 25th this year:

"Hidden Consequences: Lessons from Massachusetts for States Considering a Property Tax Cap"
by Phil Oliff and Iris J. Lav-- http://www.cbpp.org/5-21-08sfp.htm !

Remember, too-- March 25th press release this year from Robert McKeon, Sue Zimet, Ron Deutsch:
http://www.trendny.org/Press_Release-omnibus.pdf !

And let's not forget this gem released April this year from the Lincoln Institute for Land Policy:

"Property Tax Relief: The Case for Circuitbreakers"
by Daphne Kenyon, Adam Langley, and Bethany Paquin (from April 2010 "Land Lines")
https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/dl/1772_991_3%20Circuit%20Breakers.pdf !

[fact-- tho almost completely unreported by local media, I got resolutions passed in our own County Legislature here in Dutchess (with bipartisan support, even) in '08 and '09 for property tax circuitbreaker, Omnibus bill; even started petition back then inspired by info @ http://www.TrendNY.org ;
recall http://www.petitiononline.com/cuttaxes -- see http://www.OmnibusTaxSolution -- not pandering!]

[hope you just caught Gillibrand giving DioGiardi shellacking on WABC (note, too-- Gillibrand herself has long supported property tax circuitbreaker as best possible reform-- see http://www.TrendNY.org )]

[and-- if I can find time to phone bank for a few hours yesterday for http://www.DidiforSenate.com and Scott Murphy's re-election, you can too folks; get on over to Didi's Hyde Park HQ; call 233-5577 for info!]

Contrary to the continued PoJo neocon rightwing spin re: tax issues, the facts are these (tho censored):

[recall http://dutchessdemocracy.blogspot.com/2010/09/push-cuomo-to-build-true-winning-margin.html ]

Fact: Middle-class NY'ers pay 11% of our income in state and local taxes; millionaires pay only 8%.
[see: http://www.itepnet.org/wp2009/ny_whopays_factsheet.pdf ]

Fact: Millionaires used to pay 15 1/2% NY income tax rate in 70's under Rockefeller; now pay 8.97%. [see: http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/taxhistory2.htm ]

Fact: By 4-to-1 ratio New Yorkers support tiny tax on millionaires. [Hart Research Associates 6/10]
[see: http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=940073&category=state ]

Fact: Different recent Quinnipiac poll found overwhelming support even in GOP for millionaire tax.
[ http://www.newyorker.com/talk/financial/2010/08/16/100816ta_talk_surowiecki -- 8/16/10 New Yorker]

Fact: By a 3-to-1 ratio New Yorkers support re-implementing stock transfer tax on Wall Street.
[Global Research Associates 2003; see: http://www.petitiononline.com/stocktax ]

Fact: All of the following members of the Better Choice Budget Coalition stand in strong support for a new tiny millionaires tax and at least partial re-implementation of a stock transfer tax on Wall Street-- NYS AFL-CIO, NYSUT, CSEA, PEF, AFSCME, NY Jobs with Justice, Dutchess Outreach, NYS Coalition Against Domestic Violence, NY Statewide Senior Action Council, NYS Alliance for Retired Americans, Interfaith Alliance of NYS, Interfaith Impact of NYS, Sierra Club, Environmental Advocates, Citizen Action, NYS Community Action Association, and many more-- see http://www.ABetterChoiceforNY.org .

Fact: Most NYers support tax on Wall Street banks and investment firms based on size of bonuses
[Hart Research Associates June 2010]
[see: http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=940073&category=state ]

Fact: Wall Street (firms on NY Stock Exchange) made $61 billion in profits in '09-- 3x previous record.
[see: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20100328/FREE/303289966 ]

Fact : 98% of small business owners make less than $250,000/year according to Wall Street Journal.
[see: http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/taxes/Tax_Plan_Facts_FINAL.pdf ]

Fact: Even the Wall Street Journal reported Jan. 8th, 2007 that "The nation's top 1% of households own more than half the nation's stocks, according to the Federal Reserve. They also control more than $16 trillion in wealth-- more than the bottom 90%." (from Robert Frank's "Plutonomics")
[see: http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2007/01/08/plutonomics/ ]

Fact: "Citigroup's research department wrote three memos for investors concluding that wealth and power in the U.S. were increasingly concentrated in the hands of the top 1%, stating the top 1% of the population now have more financial wealth than the bottom 95% combined."
[see: http://www.michaelmoore.com/books-films/facts/capitalism-love-story (Michael Moore's last film)]

Fact: Millionaires used to pay a 91% federal income tax rate in '50's under Ike; they now pay 35%.
[sign: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/ILikeIke ; http://www.taxfoundation.org/publications/show/151.html ;
also see Chuck Collins' recent piece-- "The Small Business Case for Ending Tax Cuts for the Wealthy"--
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/10/15-1 -- and fwd all of this along to all you know!]

Fact: 70% of the U.S. economy is driven by consumer demand (the middle class needs help!).
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-30/u-s-economy-spending-picks-up-sustaining-growth-update1-.html

[pass it on]

Joel
444-0599/876-2488
joeltyner@earthlink.net

p.s. Don't forget to remind Andy C. of all this-- http://www.AndrewCuomo.com/contact ; (212) 209-3314-- all state legislature candidates running-- current state legislators too: (877) 255-9417 (fwd along too)...

[wake up, grass roots-- EXACTLY NOW is when all incumbents and challengers paying most attention!]

p.p.s. 'Bout 100 signed on in just last few weeks to "Dutchess Progressive" on Facebook; join us, folks...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.TrendNY.org ...

Siena Poll - Circuit Breaker Tops Property Tax Cap
July 22, 2008
TREND's Results bring call for Siena to re-do polling
After our organization's state-wide poll last month indicated that New Yorkers prefer an income-based circuit breaker over a tax cap, Siena university bowed to pressure to conduct a similar survey. Last month, the university released results that suggested New Yorkers want a property tax cap - the result of responses to a leading and vague question.

Yesterday's poll, however, separated out for New Yorkers the two mechanisms. The conclusion is the same as our first in the state poll indicated - the majority of New Yorkers prefer the Circuit breaker. The wording of the questions relating to the different property tax relief options varies slightly, but the results are similar.

Poll Says New Yorkers Prefer Circuit Breaker over Cap
June 22, 2008

A poll conducted and paid for by tax policy group TREND NY over the weekend shows that New Yorkers overwhelmingly support legislation that would limit a taxpayer's total property taxes over a cap on local contributions toward school funding. The random automated phone survey polled over 500 registered voters across the state asking them if they supported a measure known as a circuit breaker; which would limit an individual's total property taxes to a small percentage of their income.

By greater than a two to one margin (272/126 ) respondents preferred an income based cap on their taxes over a cap on local school levies. When given the specific choice of a 4% school tax cap or a limit of 5% of their income for their total property tax bill, as exists in Vermont, voters favored the circuit breaker by a 5 to 1 margin, 66% to 13% with 21% undecided. Respondents indicated their primary motivation was to limit taxes and not to curb school funding by an 82% to 18% margin.

"In the past, poorly worded polls that didn't explain the different types of caps have led the public into thinking that the only way overburdened New Yorkers can be helped would be to limit school levies. " said TREND Director Robert McKeon. "The truth is that a traditional tax cap will at best curb future increases, while a circuit breaker would provide immediate relief to many taxpayers and insure New Yorkers against unreasonable levels in the future. Taxpayers want a more equitable system of taxation, not just controlled spending. A circuit breaker could accomplish that. "

McKeon added that the survey results confirm the testimony given to the Governor's Commission during the course of the many hearings. "There was almost unanimous support for circuit breaker and very few calling on them to propose a cap. That's why it was disappointing to see that they would prioritize something that would not protect individuals, many of whom are overburdened."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.trendny.org/Timesunion.com_Aug_08.pdf ...

Albany, N.Y.: Timesunion.com - 8/2/08 1:31 PM

"Taxing Issue"

COUNTERPOINT: Circuit breaker the best way to limit property tax impact

By RON DEUTSCH
First published: Sunday, July 20, 2008

When New York state lawmakers talk about their proposed property tax cap, they paint a rosy picture
about its effects. It's an election year, and unfortunately they're using a glib sound bite for a complex
problem. They hear the frustration from constituents about how the cost of living is rising and, in
response, they are offering a bad option that would seriously set back the progress our schools and
students are making.

The politicians are seeking to limit the amount of support that any community can show for its schools in
school budget votes. Instead, they mandate setting an Albany-determined cap. They offer no solutions to meeting the rising costs in feeding students, fueling buses and heating and maintaining schools.

While their proposal is short on details, its effects would be clear. It would set the stage for an erosion of
much of the progress seen in New York's schools the past few years, as districts would be forced to
choose from a menu of bad choices. The menu of cuts could include athletics, Advanced Placement
courses, vocational education, art, music, and/or staff.

If these politicians would take the time to examine what has happened in other states, they would see
that undermining school resources produces predictable and unappetizing results.

California's Proposition 13, passed in 1978 was more extreme than what is proposed for New York. It
created revenue problems for cities, counties and, especially, schools.

Once a beacon of public education, California now has constant crises over education funding. Schools in wealthy districts are succeeding, as well-to-do parents can afford to funnel private donations into local educational foundations, while middle-class and high-needs districts cannot match their funding and have cut all nonessential programs.

This two-tier system of school funding blurs the line between public and private schools. It certainly goes against the spirit and letter of New York's law, which attempts to appropriate school funding fairly so all children can succeed, no matter their hometown or school district.

While Massachusetts enacted a less Draconian property tax cap, it still created unfortunate backward
movement in some schools. Some experts have reported a decline in test scores in many high-needs
districts, the kinds of schools that need more, not less, state support.

Other academic studies have shown that the lack of resources has forced many school districts to
sacrifice arts and athletic programs. That created another unintended consequence, as some parents
began moving their children to districts that provided adequate funding to their schools, abandoning
districts with fewer resources to help students succeed. Their property tax cap has deepened the
achievement chasm between some well-off and high-needs districts.

New York has a much better option. We can reduce taxes for those who really need tax relief: seniors and lower- and middle-class earners. The Legislature should establish a property tax "circuit-breaker" formula for them and limit the total property taxes to a percentage of their household income. That will help keep our schools and communities strong, make our taxes more equitable and give tax relief to those who really need it.

A recent Siena College poll found that when voters are asked to choose between the governor's arbitrary tax cap and a "real" cap on their own taxes called a circuit breaker, the majority support the
circuit-breaker approach.

The circuit breaker is the only solution that will provide real and immediate property-tax relief for residents struggling to pay their property-tax bill. The governor's proposed tax cap will slow the rate of growth, but do nothing to help people who can't pay their property taxes right now.

New York is setting the standard nationally for academic success. We don't need an election-year scheme that would potentially diminish property values across the state and hurt generations of students.

We can provide "circuit breaker" tax relief and our children can have good schools and a brighter future. If we cut revenue like California and Massachusetts did, we will create schools desperate for resources, low in results and dependent on parent contributions for survival.

Let's have real property tax relief without jeopardizing our schools' successes. The experience in other
states shows us there's a price to capping property taxes and it's the state's children who pay it.

Ron Deutsch is executive director of New Yorkers for Fiscal Fairness, which coordinates the Better Choice Budget Campaign involving a coalition of more than 100 faith-based, human service, labor and
community-based organizations in the state ( http://www.abetterchoiceforny.org ).

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.fiscalpolicy.org/propertytaxresources.html ...

Frank Mauro, head of the labor-backed Fiscal Policy Institute in New York, said a cap would perpetuate current funding inequities among school districts. "When you apply a percentage cap to change, you institutionalize the disparities and you make them worse," Mauro said. He said a circuit-breaker system would provide relief to the most overburdened homeowners.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More from http://www.TrendnNY.org ...

Wall Street can help Main Street

March 26, 2010
The Omnibus Consortium -- a statewide coalition of property tax reform groups, fiscal watchdogs, education advocates and unions -- is urging members of the Senate and Assembly to provide urgently needed property tax relief.

Wall Street should help fund this relief (property tax reform proposals can be found at www .omnibustaxsolution.org). The Consortium members contend that we can no longer continue to subsidize W all Street at the present levels while we leave people on Main Street struggling with record foreclosures and high unemployment.

The consortium members believe that there are many ways in which Wall Street can help in solving New York's property tax and budget crisis. For example, simply lowering the rebate level of the Stock Transfer Tax from 100% to 80% would produce revenue of $3.2 Billion, sufficient to gradually phase in a meaningful property tax circuit breaker while reducing the massive cuts to local governments and schools that are being debated in Albany and which would place additional pressure on our local taxes.

[see: http://www.trendny.org/Press_Release-omnibus.pdf ]

Press Release March 25, 2010

Ron Deutsch, New Yorkers for Fiscal Fairness (518) 469-6769
Gioia Shebar, Tax Nightmare.org (845) 256-0082
Susan Zimet, Ulster County Legislator, (845) 527-5309
John Whiteley, NYS Property Tax Reform Coalition, (518) 585-6837
Robert McKeon, Tax Reform Effort of Northern Dutchess (TREND) (845) 399-4582

Main Street Needs Help From Wall Street
Property Tax Groups Urge State to Stop Wall Street Giveaways

The Omnibus Consortium -- a statewide coalition of property tax reform groups, fiscal watchdogs,
education advocates and unions -- is urging members of the Senate and Assembly to provide
urgently needed property tax relief and to ask Wall Street to help fund it (property tax reform
proposals can be found at www.omnibustaxsolution.org). The Consortium members contend that
we can no longer continue to subsidize Wall Street at the present levels while we leave people on
Main Street struggling with record foreclosures and high unemployment.

Revenue collected by New York State from the Stock Transfer Tax has risen
dramatically in recent years and remained at near record levels for 2009 (approximately $16 Billion).
Unfortunately, in 1981 New York State made an agreement to rebate the entire annual amount of
the tax -- which rightfully belongs to the people of our state -- back to the brokers, basically as an
inducement to ensure the Stock Exchange's continued presence in New York City. While Wall
Street is obviously important to the state's financial health, we believe that, just as the people of our
state helped rescue Wall Street from its financial crisis, New York State should now ask Wall
Street to forgo a modest portion of the stock transfer tax rebate to fund property tax relief for
residents experiencing unsustainable property tax burdens made even worse by the state's continued
financial crisis and cuts to schools, healthcare and localities.

The consortium members believe that there are many ways in which Wall Street can help in solving
New York's property tax and budget crisis. For example, simply lowering the rebate level of the
Stock Transfer Tax from 100% to 80% would produce revenue of $3.2 Billion, sufficient to
gradually phase in a meaningful property tax circuit breaker while reducing the massive cuts to local
governments and schools that are being debated in Albany and which would place additional
pressure on our local taxes.

· The Great Recession was, in large part, caused by finance sector excesses.
· Wall Street's record 2009 profits resulted largely from taxpayer bailouts and favorable federal
monetary policies that privilege the finance sector.
· Wall Street is looking at record profits: $58 billion in 2009 (3 times higher than the previous
record set in 2006 according to Mayor Bloomberg) and cash bonuses exceeding $20 billion (which
does not count tens of billions in stock options that were given as bonuses as well)
· While Wall Street may have recovered, New York's Main Street economy remains mired in the
Great Recession.
· Widespread economic distress (lost jobs, lost health care, lost homes through foreclosures, lost
retirement savings, lost opportunities) will continue for the foreseeable future.

The Consortium also acknowledges the fact that when the state pulls back on its funding
commitments to education and aid to municipalities the inevitable result is an increase in taxes at
the local level to make up the difference.

Senate Leaders Poised to Advance Circuit Breaker
Competing Legislation Mirrors our Coalition's Omnibus
Just three weeks after Legislative leaders committed to doing something in this session on property tax reform, Senators Klein and Krueger are promoting the multi-year phasing in of the circuit breaker from our coalition's relief and reform bill - the Omnibus. Krueger's may have more political and fiscal viability as it addresses the issue of renters and the cost to the State is initially lower.

COUNTERPOINT: Circuit breaker the best
From the TimesUnion, Sunday, July 20, 2008:
New York has a much better option. We can reduce taxes for those who really need tax relief: seniors and lower- and middle-class earners. The Legislature should establish a property tax "circuit-breaker" formula for them and limit the total property taxes to a percentage of their household income. That will help keep our schools and communities strong, make our taxes more equitable and give tax relief to those who really need it.

Poughkeepsie Journal - Circuit Breaker tops
Polls come and go, but the results of a recent one by Siena Research Institute are pretty impressive. They show while New York property owners are hopping mad about taxes, they don't necessarily think a cap is the best answer.
Showing a level of sophistication and apparently paying attention to recent legislative debates, 75 percent of those polled said they would be in favor of a "circuit breaker,'' a proposal to give most homeowners a rebate if their property tax bill is more than a certain percentage of their income.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From http://www.cbpp.org/5-21-08sfp.htm ...

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

Hidden Consequences: Lessons From Massachusetts for States Considering a Property Tax Cap

By Phil Oliff and Iris J. Lav
Revised May 25, 2010

Executive Summary

Advocates of reducing property taxes often cite Proposition 2, the strict property tax cap Massachusetts adopted in 1980, as a model for reform. Most recently, New Jersey Governor Christie has proposed a cap similar to Proposition 2, which limits property tax revenues in Massachusetts to 2.5 percent of a community's assessed value and caps annual growth in a community's property tax revenue at 2.5 percent. Unfortunately, proponents typically overlook Proposition 2's harmful impact on Massachusetts, as well as the reasons why similar measures could prove even more damaging in other states.

Over the two and a half decades Proposition 2 has been in effect, Massachusetts' level of property taxation has declined. Between 1980 and 1985, property taxes as a percentage of income fell from 76 percent above the national average to 13 percent above the national average, where it stands today.[i] (Massachusetts localities rely more on the property tax than localities in much of the rest of the country because they are not permitted to levy sales or income taxes or various other forms of taxes. (See Figure 1.)

State aid has helped fill in some of the gaps in local funding the law created, but not all of them and not reliably over time. Furthermore, the local "overspending" that proponents claimed Proposition 2 ? could curb did not exist in the imagined quantities, and necessary public services have been jeopardized.

By limiting Massachusetts localities' only major source of revenue, Proposition 2 ? has exacted a considerable cost - one that highlights the shortcomings of property tax revenue caps as a policy approach. The law has:

* arbitrarily constrained local governments' ability to raise revenues without any consideration of the actual cost of providing services;

* made local governments heavily dependent on state aid, which tends to fluctuate with economic cycles and state policies (a particular problem in an economic downturn when state aid usually declines but the need for local services such as education and fire and police protection does not decline);

* exacerbated disparities between wealthier communities and poorer ones in access to quality local services, as many of the former have voted to override Proposition 2 ?'s revenue cap while the latter have generally had to adhere to it; and

* resulted in cuts to valued services rather than simply calling forth greater efficiency from local governments.

Across Massachusetts, a number of communities have been forced to lay off teachers, police officers, firefighters, and other public employees; close fire stations; shut libraries, senior centers, and recreation centers or sharply reduce their hours; and scale back public school programs. One town even turned off its street lights to save money.

The Massachusetts experience can provide lessons about the potential effects of a property tax cap for other states that are considering similar measures. This report looks at the Massachusetts experience and gleans the following lessons.

* A tax cap won't make government services cost less. A cap does not prevent employee health insurance costs, special education costs, or other costs beyond localities' control from rising much faster than the cap allows. Nor does it hold down the cost of heating buildings, buying gas for police and fire vehicles, and operating schools buses when the world price of oil is skyrocketing. When these things occur, as they have in Massachusetts, other services have to be cut to fit total expenditures under the cap.

* Claims that caps will produce large savings through "efficiencies" are overblown. There are fewer efficiencies to realize from squeezing down revenues than cap proponents generally suggest. One person's "efficiency savings," such as the elimination of a police or fire station, may represent the loss of a critical service for another person. Ultimately, a property tax cap is highly likely to lead to reductions in basic community services and a deterioration in the quality of life in many communities - particularly in communities that cannot routinely override it.

* Tax caps can be particularly harmful if adopted during a weak economy. Proposition 2 ? took effect during a period of extraordinary economic growth - the "Massachusetts Miracle." State revenues were rising, which allowed the state to boost aid to compensate for constrained property taxes, and construction was expanding, which allowed communities to raise their property tax revenue by more than 2.5 percent per year.
If a state were to adopt a property tax cap during an economic slowdown or a period of weak state revenue growth, a major sustained infusion of state aid would not be possible and property tax revenue growth would be more constrained. As a result, schools and other services dependent on the property tax would have to be cut much more severely than in Massachusetts.

* State aid can't be relied upon to fill the gap. Even when state policymakers fully intend to expand state aid to fill local funding gaps created by a cap, a recession or fiscal crisis will usually derail this plan. State aid to localities in Massachusetts has fluctuated greatly with the business cycle and with state policy decisions. In any other state that might implement a cap, local government and school budgets are likely to become more volatile.

* Changes in school enrollment can have a big impact. The adoption of Proposition 2 ? coincided with a decline in Massachusetts' K-12 enrollment, allowing schools to operate with less revenue.

If another state adopted a property tax cap during a period of steady or rising enrollment, it would be forced to impose much more extensive cutbacks in teachers, classes, and programs than those seen in Massachusetts.

* Without effectively targeted state aid, low-income communities will fall even further behind. Massachusetts has a highly targeted system of aiding local governments. The influx of state aid seems to have shielded low-income communities somewhat from Proposition 2 ?'s tendency to exacerbate differences in services between high- and low-income communities. But when state aid has receded as a result of economic downturns or state policy decisions, the poorest communities have had to make the largest budget cuts.

In states that do not have a system of school aid that is targeted as effectively as Massachusetts', students in low-income communities are likely to fall increasingly behind students in schools that have greater resources.

* Wealthier communities will override a tax cap more frequently than poorer ones. This has contributed to a growing spending gap between local governments in high-income communities and all other communities, despite Massachusetts' progressive system of state aid. This is likely to occur in other states that implement a cap.

* Middle-income communities might end up bearing the brunt of a cap. In Massachusetts, budgets in middle-income communities grew more slowly than budgets in either low-income or high-income communities because they did not receive as much state aid as the former or override Proposition 2 as often as the latter.

Proposition 2 is a structurally flawed policy that has significantly eroded local services in Massachusetts despite a number of factors that have mitigated its impact. Massachusetts had the benefit of an unusually strong economy, declining school enrollment, and a system of effectively targeted school aid. Proposition 2 nevertheless has had negative results for the provision of quality public services in Massachusetts. Other states that attempt to impose a similar tax cap without the benefit of Massachusetts' mitigating factors are likely to face even worse consequences.

The Basics of Proposition 2

Proposition 2 sets two kinds of restrictions on the amount of property taxes that a local government can collect: a levy ceiling and a levy limit.

Levy Ceiling: The levy ceiling limits property tax collections to 2.5 percent of the assessed value of a community's property.[1]

Levy Limit: Proposition 2 set a property tax limit for each community in fiscal year 1982 equal to the lesser of a community's actual property taxes or 2.5 percent of the community's assessed value.[2] This "levy limit" grows by 2.5 percent per year.

Proposition 2 allows communities to adjust their levy limit upward to account for "new growth": increases in the tax base that are not the result of revaluation. Such increases can result from the development of new properties, changes in assessed value that result from the renovation or expansion of existing properties, reclassification of properties that were previously exempt from taxation, or the conversion of existing properties into condominiums or new subdivisions.

A community taxing below its levy limit can increase its property tax collections to the limit at any time. The levy limit cannot exceed the levy ceiling.

A community's residents can chose to permanently increase, or override, their levy limit through a majority vote.

Capital Outlay and Debt Exclusions: A community may vote to temporarily exceed its levy limit or levy ceiling for the payment of certain capital expenditures or debt service costs.[3]

[1] "Levy Limits: A Primer on Proposition 2 ?," Massachusetts Department of Revenue, Division of Local Services, Revised June 2005, p. 4.
[2]David M. Cutler, Douglas W. Elmendorf, and Richard Zeckhauser, "Restraining the Leviathan: Property Tax Limitation in Massachusetts," National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, August 1997, pp 4-5.
[3] "Levy Limits: A Primer on Proposition 2 ?."


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

More from http://www.FiscalPolicy.org ...

100 Faith Leaders Urge State Leaders to Explore Revenue Options
An Open Letter from New York's Religious Leaders to Governor David Paterson the Leaders of the New York State Legislature

http://readme.readmedia.com/100-Faith-Leaders-Urge-State-Leaders-to-Explore-Revenue-Options/1456428

ALBANY, NY (06/17/2010)(readMedia)-- Over 100 New York faith leaders signed on to an open letter to the legislature urging them to support a budget that protects families and public services in NYS. The faith leaders are concerned that our leaders are making cuts to vital public services that will drive families deeper into poverty, diminish their chances for a quality education and affect their ability to access affordable healthcare.

"Governmental budgets are fundamentally moral documents. They express the collective values of the community," said the Rev. Dr. Richard S. Gilbert, President of Interfaith Impact of NYS. "I urge passage of a budget that fairly funds health, welfare and education especially, even if it means an increase in state revenues. Certainly this wealthy state can afford to fund services for the poor, our children and those who need health care."

In an already struggling economy, cuts will continue to weaken the state and have devastating effects on working class families. The proposed cuts would further endanger community healthcare institutions, put our children at risk by underfunding our schools, and put families at risk by increasing layoffs and diminishing access to the social services that provide a critical safety net for New Yorkers struggling to survive through these hard times.

"Scriptures from all faiths are united in one over-arching principle: compassion for the oppressed," stated Rev. Caspar Green of First Baptist Church in Glens Falls. "People of faith must take action to see that universal values of human dignity and worth are not an afterthought in the final budget discussions."

"At a time of recession and hardship, we need to see our state's leaders working diligently with a vision for unity and the common good," said Rev. Dr. Victor Collier of Mt. Olive Baptist Church in Albany, "Sadly, we have seen no sign of that sort of statesmanship so far. As someone who honors the call of God for compassion and justice, I urge state lawmakers to renew their efforts to find common ground and bring swift and needed relief to the poor through the state budget."

New York can implement a just and sensible policy package that will help set working families and New York State back on track. Reasonable measures should include asking those with the most means in our state to help those with the least. Equitable options should include asking the financial sector to help as they have just benefited and recovered from our bail out assistance, instituting new income tax brackets for millionaires; and closing tax loopholes that allow large, highly profitable corporations to avoid taxation. These sensible measures should significantly reduce the need for more public service cuts and even more job losses.